four New York Times reporters have been secretly confiscated by the Trump administration. However, similar reports from CNN and The Washington Post appear to reveal how much former President Trump used the administration to monitor journalists, but one of the four journalists said the move was It states that it is part of the “bipartisan pattern”.
“The same thing happened with the Obama administration, so frankly I was angry, but I wasn’t surprised,” White House reporter Matt Apzzo told CBSN on Monday. “This US federation in Washington. The prosecutor’s office has a history of forcing the First Amendment. “
He compared it to the tactics used by “prosecutors trying to destroy drug organizations.”
The Biden administration warned New York Times reporters that the former president’s Justice Department had seized four months of records in 2017.
The latest revelation was reported by outlets, while many Times executives were aware of government efforts earlier this year, but were bound by a gag order prohibiting them from sharing information with their editors and newsrooms. It was done after.
Apzzo doesn’t yet know what the Justice Department was looking for, but believes it is related to the story of James Comey’s decision in 2016.
“This story touched on perhaps the most significant time in FBI history, when the FBI was essentially investigating two major presidential candidates,” he said.
The New York Times reported in early 2020 that the Justice Department had begun investigating media leaks related to the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email.
Biden’s Ministry of JusticeA policy change announced on Saturday seized a secret reporter’s communication record during a leak investigation.
In May, the president called the policy and its actions “simply wrong.”
“Of course, I don’t swallow their words,” said Apzzo. “Why did this happen? Why did it happen? There are rules, and they experience this under the Obama administration, and the rules change. It was supposed to be “
He pointed out the past administrations of both parties using confidential information leaks as an excuse to seize journalist records, and he dismissed it as a “red herring.”
“In Washington, DC, you don’t get a subpoena just because you wrote a classified article, you get a subpoena just because you wrote something that the government doesn’t like,” he said.
“No one has a problem writing about Bin Laden’s assault. If you offend the president or the Justice Ministry, you’ll get a subpoena. That’s exactly what it is.”
He criticized the policy as “dictators and influential people around the world target journalists.”An increasingly authoritarian government is tightening restrictions on independent media.
“This is, frankly, the message that politicians from both parties are sending around the world,” Apzzo said.
Reporters whose communications were secretly seized by the Trump White House say they also happened under Obama
Source link Reporters whose communications were secretly seized by the Trump White House say they also happened under Obama