It is a well-known fact that we oppose the removal of the Senate’s 60-vote threshold. I had the same view in the US House of Representatives for three terms and said the same after being elected to the Senate in 2018. If anyone expects my party to reverse my position because it controls the Senate, they are the same as my approach to parliamentary legislation, whether minority or majority.
When you reach the majority, you want to believe that you will stay In the majority.But a minority in the Democratic Senate Use 60-vote threshold Filibuster of police reform bill and its bailout bill last year Many Democrats saw As inadequate. These filibusters were not attempted to thwart progress, but to force ongoing negotiations for a better solution.
Also, the filibuster used in previous meetings may be needed to protect women’s health, from attacks on clean air and water, or to help children and families in need.
My support for maintaining the 60-vote threshold is not based on the importance of a particular policy. It is based on what is best for our democracy. Filibuster forces moderation and helps protect the country from violent fluctuations between conflicting policy poles.
For those who want to eliminate legislative filibuster For people’s law (I support and co-sponsor the Election Rights Act), I ask: If we do, the law will be withdrawn a few years from now and replaced by the national voter ID law. Is it good for our country just by looking at it? Restrictions on voting by mail in federal elections over minority opposition?
Republicans are trying to sink Democratic efforts to push major voting bills – Live | US News
Source link Republicans are trying to sink Democratic efforts to push major voting bills – Live | US News