Pittsburgh

Scott Peterson’s murder conviction review – Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2020-10-16 20:23:00 –

The California Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered a second review of Scott Peterson’s conviction for the murder of his pregnant wife and unborn son, less than two months after he overturned his death sentence. the case is being referred to San Mateo County Superior Court to determine whether Peterson should receive a new trial, the Los Angeles Times reported. The court said a juror had committed “prejudicial fault” by failing to disclose that she had been involved in other legal proceedings. The juror filed a lawsuit in 2000 seeking a restraining order after her boyfriend’s ex-girlfriend harassed her while she was pregnant, the Times reported. The juror said she feared for her unborn child. victim of a crime or involved in a lawsuit, she said no, Peterson’s attorneys told The Times. In a case that caught the world’s attention, Peterson was convicted in 2004 of first degree murder of Laci Peterson, 27, eight months pregnant. He was also convicted of the second degree murder of his unborn son, Connor. He maintained his innocence. Laci Peterson went missing on Christmas Eve 2002. Her husband, who lived in Modesto, told police he left that morning to go fishing in Berkeley. Prosecutors said Peterson dumped their bodies from his fishing boat in San Francisco Bay, where their bodies washed up nearly four months later. They were found a few miles from where Peterson said he was fishing. Peterson was eventually arrested after Amber Frey, a massage therapist living in Fresno, told police that they started dating a month before his wife died, but told her his wife was In August, the State Supreme Court overturned Peterson’s death. phrasing. The judges cited “significant errors” in the selection of jurors. The court said potential jurors were unfairly dismissed after saying they personally disagreed with the death penalty but would be prepared to follow the law and impose it.

Video above: Scott Peterson’s death sentence overturned in 2002, murder of pregnant woman

The California Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered a second review of Scott Peterson’s conviction for the murder of his pregnant wife and unborn son, less than two months after he overturned his death sentence.

The court returned the case to San Mateo County Superior Court to determine whether Peterson should receive a new trial, the Los Angeles Times reported.

The court said a juror had committed “prejudicial misconduct” by not disclosing that she had been involved in other legal proceedings. The juror filed a lawsuit in 2000 seeking a restraining order after her boyfriend’s ex-girlfriend harassed her while she was pregnant. says the Times.

The juror said she feared for her unborn child.

Yet when asked as a potential juror if she had ever been a victim of a crime or involved in a trial, she said no, Peterson’s lawyers told The Times.

In a case that has gained worldwide attention, Peterson was convicted in 2004 of the first degree murder of Laci Peterson, 27, eight months pregnant. He was also convicted of the second degree murder of his unborn son, Connor.

He maintained his innocence.

Laci Peterson went missing on Christmas Eve 2002. Her husband, who lived in Modesto, told police he left that morning to go fishing in Berkeley.

Prosecutors claimed Peterson dumped their bodies from his fishing boat in San Francisco Bay, where their bodies washed ashore nearly four months later. They were found a few miles from where Peterson said he was fishing.

Investigators searched for nearly 10,000 tips and identified parolees and convicted sex offenders as possible suspects. Peterson was eventually arrested after Amber Frey, a massage therapist living in Fresno, told police they started dating a month before his wife died, but told her that his wife was dead.

In August, the state Supreme Court overturned Peterson’s death sentence. The judges cited “significant errors” in the selection of jurors.

The court said potential jurors were unfairly dismissed after saying they personally disagreed with the death penalty but would be prepared to follow the law and impose it.

Source link

Back to top button