Supreme Court denies Texas lawsuit over Biden’s victory over Trump

Friday’s Supreme Court began in Texas, with President Donald Trump trying to revoke Joe Biden’s election victory in major swing states in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. I rejected the favored bid.

The ruling had a fatal blow to Trump’s desperate and unsuccessful efforts to overturn Biden’s expected victory for the Electoral College.

The victory of the former Vice President of the Democratic Party was confirmed three days before the electors were set to vote in their respective states.

From the beginning, election law experts said the proceedings were unlikely to succeed. But Trump, who even filed a petition to intervene in the case himself, touted Paxton’s proceedings as “big.”

In denying Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s request to file proceedings against four battlefield states, Supreme Court judges said they made changes to the voting procedure during the coronavirus pandemic. He said Texas had no reason to sue other states.

The court said, “A petition for vacation to file a Texas complaint was dismissed because of a lack of status under Article 3 of the Constitution.” In order for an individual or group, such as a state, to have legal status in proceeding, it must be able to show that it has been damaged by the actions of others.

“Texas has shown no judicial interest in how other states hold elections. All other pending allegations are dismissed as a dispute,” the Supreme Court said. ..

“The Supreme Court really disappointed us,” Trump said in a tweet late Friday.

“I have no wisdom or courage!”

“We’re not over. Believe me,” Trump’s private attorney Rudy Giuliani, who led the campaign’s efforts to challenge the election results, told Newsmax in an interview.

Giuliani told the press in Texas, “The proceedings were not dismissed in this case. The proceedings were dismissed in candidacy. Therefore, the answer is now to the district court by the president, some electors. Is to raise. Claims some of the same facts that would stand. “

“Of course there is nothing to prevent the president from immediately filing these proceedings in a standing district court. Some electors are in a position to violate their constitutional rights. “Let’s do it,” added the former Mayor of New York.

But Mr. Trump, who appointed three judges to nine courts, said he believed the Supreme Court would ultimately decide the race before the November 3 elections.

So, shortly after the death of liberal Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg in September, Mr. Trump said, “I think it’s very important to have nine judges.”

Trump has nominated Amy Coney Barrett to replace Ginsburg. She was approved by a Republican-controlled Senate over fierce opposition by Democrats who said the appointment was inappropriate because it was so close to the election.

Biden spokesman Mike Gwin said in a statement Friday evening that the court “resolutely and swiftly refused to attack the democratic process by Donald Trump and his allies.”

“This is not surprising. Dozens of judges, election officials from both parties, and Trump’s own Attorney General have rejected unfounded attempts to deny that he lost the election.” Mr Gwin said. “President Biden’s clear and overwhelming victory will be approved by the Electoral College on Monday and he will be sworn in on January 20.”

The Texas lawsuit has made an unprecedented request to the Supreme Court to invalidate the election results of the four fierce battle states by declaring that the electoral college votes are “uncountable.”

Biden’s victory in four states, which together held 62 electoral votes, exceeded the 270 electoral college threshold needed to secure the president. Biden is expected to win 306 electoral votes compared to Trump’s 232 votes.

If Texas had won the proceedings, it would have nullified Biden’s victory.

Two of the most conservative judges in the High Court, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, said in a brief opposition that they allowed Paxton to file a proceeding, but the “other relief” sought in the proceeding. I don’t admit it. “

“In my view, there is no discretion to refuse to file a complaint invoice if it is within our original jurisdiction,” Arito wrote in a statement backed by Thomas. “Therefore, I accept the motion to file a complaint claim, but I do not accept any other remedies, nor do I express any views on other issues.”

Benjamin Vittes, a legal analyst at NBC News, opposed the decision by Arito and Thomas to allow the proceedings, but, along with seven other judges in the Supreme Court, rejected Texas’ claims about the benefits of the proceedings. Said it would be.

More than 12 states where Trump won the popularity poll submitted briefs in support of Texas’ actions. In addition, more than 120 Republicans, including House Minority leader Kevin McCarthy and R-Caliph, submitted briefs in their “Friends of the Court” briefs.

However, about 20 states and territories that Biden won have submitted their own briefs in opposition to Texas complaints.

Friday afternoon, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. Accused the Republicans of supporting the case involved in “destroying elections that jeopardize our democracy.”

“This proceeding is an act that fuels Republican despair, and it violates the principles enshrined in our American democracy,” Pelosi wrote.

“As members of the House of Representatives, we take a solemn vow to uphold and uphold the Constitution,” her letter said. “Republicans overturn the Constitution with a reckless and fruitless attack on our democracy, which could seriously undermine public confidence in our most sacred democratic institutions, and our progress on urgent challenges. Is retreating. “

In a statement, Nebraska Republican Senator Ben Sasse, who clashed with Trump, said the Supreme Court had finally “closed the book on nonsense.”

“Since the night of the election, many have turned Kenya’s Berser style to confuse voters. Chavez has manipulated the election from a serious conspiracy theory, but everything he cares about the rule of law. Americans have closed the book on nonsense — the Supreme Court needs to be reassured — including all three picks by President Trump. ”

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, who represented the state in opposition to the Paxton proceedings, said the ruling “is important to remind us that we are a country of law, and some people. May succumb to the wishes of an individual, but the court will not. “

Supreme Court denies Texas lawsuit over Biden’s victory over Trump

Source link Supreme Court denies Texas lawsuit over Biden’s victory over Trump

Back to top button