Washington – On Monday, the Supreme Court dismissed an objection to the constitutionality of the federal requirement that only men register for draft as adults and refused to reconsider their previous decision in favor of a policy on selective services.
Case Rejected It requires all men in the United States to enroll in a selective service system when they are 18 years old. Failure to do so will result in a federal student loan or refusal to appoint a civil servant and deprivation of citizenship. Or you may even face criminal liability.
However, a group called the National Men’s Union and two of its members, James Resmeister and Anthony Davis, argued that gender-based requirements were unconstitutional and unlawful sexism and passed the law to the Supreme Court. Asked to disable it.
“Registration requirements are one of the last gender-based classifications in federal law.” Petition Ask the Supreme Court to hear the case. “It imposes a selective burden on men, reinforces the idea that women are not perfect and equal citizens, and perpetuates the stereotypes of men and women’s abilities.”
Acting on behalf of American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) lawyers, they urged the Supreme Court to determine the constitutionality of the requirements without changing the draft system.
An ACLU lawyer told the Supreme Court, “If this court denies the registration of men only, Congress can choose the path to go from there.”
so statement Respecting the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the proceedings, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, along with Judges Stephen Breyer and Brett Kavanaugh, said lawmakers were considering whether to change the requirements.
“Of course, it’s still unclear whether Congress will end gender-based registration under the Military Selective Service Act,” Sotomayor wrote. “But at least for now, the court’s long-standing respect for Congress on national defense and military issues warns against allowing reviews while Congress is actively considering the issue.
This is the second time the High Court has been asked to determine the constitutionality of men-only registration requirements. In a 6 to 3 ruling in 1981, the Supreme Court upheld federal requirements because women were barred from engaging in combat missions.
However, although the Pentagon lifted the ban in 2013, the obligation to register in the draft remains limited to men. The Pentagon also announced in 2015 that all military roles, troops and schools would be open to women without exception.
Following the Pentagon’s move, a committee established by Parliament will evaluate whether the registration requirements will be extended to women, and determined women will need to register for selective services.Abolition of registration for men only, panel wrote in it 2020 reportWas “a necessary and overdue measure in the best interests of the United States.”
The issue in the Supreme Court was whether the 1981 ruling should be overturned and whether the federal requirement that only men register in the draft is unconstitutional.
After the National Coalition for Men filed a lawsuit, the United States District Court for the State of Texas declared the requirement unconstitutional, but Congress said it was best prepared to reform the draft registration system. The Selective Service System, the body that maintains the draft registration, has appealed, and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has cited the Supreme Court’s 1981 ruling.
“It’s time to dismiss the lost car,” an ACLU lawyer told the High Court, referring to a previous ruling. “Registration requirements have no legitimate purpose and are strict as required by sex-based law. I can’t stand the scrutiny. “
Ministry of Justice Appeal to the Supreme Court It would be “premature” to claim that the reexamination of the constitutionality of registration requirements is “premature” as Congress is considering the scope of the bill.
Supreme Court dismisses dispute over male-only conscription registration
Source link Supreme Court dismisses dispute over male-only conscription registration