Atlanta, Georgia 2022-06-23 14:29:57 –
(CNN) — Thursday’s Supreme Court Supporting and Dominating Convict on Death Row Georgia challenges the state’s lethal injection protocol and aims to die by firing squad. This is a method that is not currently permitted in the state.
The court said detainees could file an objection under federal civil rights law, which allows individuals to seek relief if their constitutional rights are violated. This decision may make it easier for prisoners to challenge potential execution methods.
The 5-4 majority opinion was written by Judge Elena Kagan, written by Judge Amy Coney Barrett, with the addition of Judges Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch. I did.
Kagan said the law in question, Section 1983, “widely admits proceedings against state authorities for the deprivation of rights secured by the Constitution.”
“Read literally,” she said, “the word will apply to all of the prisoners’ constitutional claims.”
In his dissenting opinion, Barrett argued that: However, if the objection prevents the state from enforcing the conviction or judgment, Habeas’s requirements for stricter and more federalist protection apply. “
Barrett she “understands[s] The urge for prisoners to use civil rights proceedings rather than Habeas’s petition to raise such claims in light of the latter obstacle, “she said, a suitable forum for such a challenge is federal. I concluded that it was a state court, not a court.
Matthew Hellman, a partner of Jenner & Block on behalf of the prisoners, said in a statement Thursday that the decision would give prisoners a “way to seek humane and legal executions.”
“We are very pleased with the court’s decision to ensure that prisoners have judicial means of seeking protection from cruel and unusual punishment,” Hermann said.
Michael Nance, who was sentenced to death in 2002, claimed that Georgia’s lethal injection protocol endangered veins, resulting in cruel and unusual punishment in his case. He wants to die by firing squad, a method that is not currently part of the Georgia Protocol.
In 1993, he stole a car and drove it to a bank in Georgia. He took a revolver, put on a ski mask, went into the bank, and asked the treasurer to put money in his pillowcase. Teller slipped two dye packets into the bag and when Nance returned to the car he released a red dye and tear gas. He threw away his money, rushed to a nearby parking lot, attempted a carjacking, and shot an innocent bystander, Gabor Barog.
The question before the judge was how Nance could bring his challenge. The Supreme Court’s case requires prisoners to challenge his method of execution in order to identify another method of execution that does not violate his constitutional rights. However, Nance proposed a method that is not currently permitted in Georgia: firing squad. He has exhausted his ability to bring Habeas’s allegations to federal court, and his only remaining option was to use Section 1983 of Civil Rights Act.
Supreme Court sides with Georgia inmate who wants to die by firing squad Source link Supreme Court sides with Georgia inmate who wants to die by firing squad