Tay Anderson to be censured by DPS Board during Friday meeting – Denver, Colorado

Denver, Colorado 2021-09-16 21:00:31 –

Denver-Denver Public School Director Tyanerson will be blamed by the district school board on Friday, the 23-year-old was confirmed on Twitter early Thursday morning.

“I have official confirmation, I will be blamed by the school board tomorrow,” Anderson said. Tweet Immediately after 6 pm on Thursday.

Anderson said he would speak before the school board, which is scheduled to start at 1 pm.

“I will work with members such as @NAACP and the Denver Ministerial Alliance to deal with the blame vote,” he said in a tweet.

He will speak at 12:15 pm

News will come the next day Independent report In allegations of sexual misconduct imposed on him Anderson was found to have had “frivolous social media contact” with a 16-year-old Denver Public School (DPS) student, even if the most serious accusations were not substantiated. While he is a member of the board and making intimidating and intimidating social media posts to witnesses.

“The Board strongly believes that the investigation treated Anderson in a fair manner. The most disastrous accusations have not been substantiated and the Board is grateful. However, the report reports that it is a member of the Board. As elected civil servants, we must hold ourselves and each other to the highest standards in achieving the best interests of the district, “the board said Wednesday. Said in a statement provided by DPS Spokesman Will Jones.

From his part-and before Thursday’s tweet-Anderson Said in a statement He said it was after discussing the report at a press conference in the coming days and further reviewing the report.

According to the report, the investigators interviewed 63 people as part of the investigation, and Anderson said he met the investigators twice and “answered all the questions we asked,” both directly and in writing. ..

“Director Anderson did not refuse to answer the question. He also responded to all requests for information we made. He was supportive of this process,” the report said. I am.

Investigators wrote that their report did not express an opinion on the truthfulness of the allegations.

Anderson left his role in June after an anonymous allegation of sexual misconduct filed against him in the spring.he Return to work in mid-July And he always claimed that the claim was false. In March, the group Black Lives Matter 5280 said a woman Anderson claimed to have sexually assaulted her in February, Anderson denied.

Woman in may Testimony in front of the legislative committee The school board said no one had reported such allegations to police at the time, but about sexual predators in the school system that targeted students. Anderson has denied his allegations over the past few months.

Anderson was reportedly a high school young woman and a candidate for the board, while another woman was speaking on social media while on the board, but only the former spoke to investigators.

The girl who spoke to the investigator said she started talking in 2018 when she was a senior at a school in Douglas County at the age of 17. She asks the investigator to go on a date, but says she has never hung out with him in private. She said he was grateful for her because “I felt very uncomfortable and scared to go to the place in case I met him.”

Investigators found Anderson admitting that he was flirting with her, but he told them he believed she had graduated from high school.

The survey also revealed a more flirting message from August 2020 between Anderson and a DPS student who was 16 at the time. Anderson told investigators that it was a “mistake.”

Later, he reportedly learned of the girl’s age and stopped communicating with the students.

The accusation of “intimidating and intimidating social media posts” is related to Anderson switching his Facebook cover photo to a Bugs Bunny photo, putting his gun on his chest and captioning “Do it bitch.” I have. He reportedly posted the photo the day after the allegations were filed in the legislative hearing. According to the report, two people reported that the post felt “intended to intimidate a woman who could come forward in response to testimony.”

But Anderson told investigators, “No one on social media had any hints about targeting or taunting targets.”

In addition, a July 7 post, in which at least one school board member spoke of Anderson’s “warning” to those who “despise my name,” spoke of Anderson’s allegations.

However, the report further added, “There is no evidence of sexual contact between candidate / director Anderson and the student he was sending a message to,” Anderson directed other people’s social media activities. There is no evidence that. “

Regarding the accusations charged in the legislative trial, the report states that the allegations are “objectively unbelievable in their faces.”

Investigators concluded that “most of the reported actions do not imply integrity, high ethical standards, respectful actions, and a commitment to uphold the US and Colorado Constitutions.”

Blame Anderson does not mean that the school board will remove him from his post – it is not what they can do because the school board members are elected by voters rather than colleagues. Rather, voting to blame fellow school board members only leads to reprimands or criticisms for non-compliance with the school board’s bylaws, rules, and codes of conduct.

Tay Anderson to be censured by DPS Board during Friday meeting Source link Tay Anderson to be censured by DPS Board during Friday meeting

Back to top button