Tesla drivers using autopilot don’t see much on the road, MIT research shows

All news articles headlined by Tesla get a lot of attention. So it’s no wonder that crashes related to the company’s “autopilot” feature seem to receive more news coverage than other manufacturers.

A new study provides data on the behavior of drivers using the autopilot. The conclusion may seem obvious: they take their eyes off the road longer and more often than when they don’t use it. That is, if Tesla is traveling at a set speed, but is within the lane markings and at a safe distance from the vehicle in front, the driver’s attention can be distracted.

Journal study Accident analysis and preventionWritten by four researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology AgelabAn interdisciplinary research program that works to improve the quality of life of older people. The researchers created a model based on observations of the driver’s eye focus before and after releasing the autopilot in 290 separate cases. The title of the treatise is “A model of naturalistic glance behavior regarding the departure of the Tesla autopilot.. “

The conclusion is clear. When the autopilot was active, “the driver was less visible on the road and focused on areas unrelated to driving compared to after the transition to manual driving.” In addition, the driver was on the road. “Long looking ahead wasn’t enough to compensate,” as the driver spent more time looking away from the road in front of him when he returned to surveillance.

Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) have been in use for many years. The first one was adaptive cruise control. This required the driver to steer the car, but had to take his foot off the pedals. Automatic emergency braking and active lane control (lane keeping assist) are now available on many vehicles on the road, along with blind spot warnings, parking lot rear crossing traffic braking, and many other features. NS AAA described in the research treatise Three years ago, the combination of these systems was able to prevent 40% of collisions, 27% of injuries and 29% of deaths when installed in all US vehicles.

The tricky part occurs when individual ADAS features are integrated into the system, providing the possibility for the car to steer itself on the highway for extended periods of time without driver intervention. The ultimate goal is not only the existing “footoff” feature, but also the “handoff” feature. But if the driver doesn’t have to use his hands or feet to drive, he doesn’t know how the algorithm creates new sensor data, so he regains control when the car needs to regain control. How can I get enough attention to?

“All hands-free systems on the market, such as GM’s Supercruise, Ford’s Blue Cruise, and Nissan’s ProPilot 2.0, use infrared cameras to track the driver’s head pose and gaze,” he said. Sam Abu Elsamide, Principal Research Analyst at Guidehouse Insight, explains. An automatic safety system that has been studied for a long time.

He has taken various steps to get the driver’s attention after the car maker no longer has to steer the driver. Abuelsamid suggests that such eye-tracking systems are “much better than the steering torque sensors used in hands-on systems such as Tesla’s AutoPilot, Ford’s Copilot 360+, Nissan ProPilot, and Volvo Drive Pilot.” increase.

Not only is Tesla less effective with these two methods, Mimicking the driver’s hand input to Tesla’s steering wheel It is sold commercially.Meanwhile, a video of a driver doing a dangerous stunt like Ride the backseat of Tesla with the autopilot Get huge traffic from social media.

Michael SimariCar and driver

Is Tesla mistreated?

As a result, Tesla is often the subject of headlines that rarely apply to other manufacturers. On Tuesday, Reuters wrote in a news article, “A. Life-and-death question to regulators: Is Tesla’s autopilot safe?“According to the report, safety regulators have reviewed 33 individual Tesla crashes since 2016, when the Tesla ADAS system was suspected of being used, three of which were US Department of Transportation Road Traffic Safety. The Bureau (NHTSA) has ruled out the use of autopilots as a cause of non-fatal conflicts.

“I personally agree with requiring infrared-based drive-eye tracking on all vehicles, regardless of their level of automation,” said Abuelsamid. Car and driver.. “It’s far more effective in preventing driver distractions, such as using a phone or driving drowsy, than a law banning the use of mobile devices.”

Tesla claims that autopilots, when used properly, are safer than human drivers, Data is questioned With various criticisms. A complete forensic examination of all such crashes by NHTSA may be required to resolve the issue of how safe or unsafe the system is. Until then, MIT’s research has added data to the discussion about what the driver does when using the autopilot.

This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content on their website in different formats, or you may be able to find more information.

This content is created and maintained by third parties and imported into this page so that users can provide their email address. For more information on this and similar content, please visit

Tesla drivers using autopilot don’t see much on the road, MIT research shows

Source link Tesla drivers using autopilot don’t see much on the road, MIT research shows

Back to top button