Riverside, California 2022-05-15 20:38:53 –
In the mixed decision, the court upheld only an injunction relating to one family member in the proceedings.
Texas, USA — The Supreme Court of Texas Reversal An injunction that prevented the state from investigating the parents of transgender children for child abuse, but upheld an injunction against one family member who sued the state.
In March, Texas Governor Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton issued their opinions and letters. Family and protection services department (DFPS) Investigate parents who provide treatment to adolescent transgender children at the direction of health care professionals.
The proceedings in question continued shortly thereafter.court opinion Plaintiffs state that the child is a couple diagnosed with gender identity and is a doctor who treats the child with a similar diagnosis. The group sued the Governor, DFPS Commissioner, and DFPS and challenged the directive and DFPS authority to investigate the use of medical care deemed illegal by Abbott.
The district court has issued a temporary injunction prohibiting proceedings against plaintiffs under the order and investigation of reports based solely on allegations of child abuse related to the Gender Confirmation Care Order.
The state has appealed the decision and the Court of Appeals has issued a temporary order to revive the entire temporary injunction.
However, the Supreme Court of Texas ruled that the Court of Appeals crossed that boundary, did not have “general authority to revive temporary injunctions of any nature,” and “the Court of Appeals was state-wide. I did not have the authority to give relief to non-parties. ” “”
The judge said this was also the case for Abbott, who “lacks the authority to issue a binding’command’to DFPS.”
The High Court ruling took four major actions.
- He upheld an injunction to prevent the state from investigating the family who first sued the state, and the governor excluded him from the proceedings because he could not enforce the law.
- DFPS has declared an opinion from the Attorney General that families should be investigated to provide non-binding medical care to transgender children.
- DFPS has declared Abbott’s statement that it is necessary to investigate families that provide non-binding medical care to transgender children.
- The DFPS said it had the discretion to investigate allegations of child abuse, as it did before the AG’s opinion and the Governor’s letter.
“Today’s decision is a victory for our clients and the rule of law. The Supreme Court of Texas will take some steps against the Attorney General and the Governor to help families who support their children by providing the highest standards of medical care. The court has dismissed the Attorney General’s allegation that our case should be dismissed, and the DFPS is not directed by the Governor or the Attorney General’s binding force. I have confirmed that I do not have to follow my opinion.
“The court has limited the order to the Doe family and Dr. Mooney, but Texas law has not changed, and reporters and DFPS employees who need to take action based on the Governor’s instructions and the Attorney General’s opinion. By supporting the injunction, the court acknowledged that an investigation based solely on the provision of medically necessary gender-verifying care would cause irreparable harm. It is unreasonable for the DFPS to continue these lawless investigations for the duration of this lawsuit, and we will not stop fighting here in Texas to protect the safety and livelihoods of transgender youth. “
Read the full opinion of the Supreme Court of Texas Here..
Texas Supreme Court reverses injunction barring investigations of parents of transgender children for child abuse Source link Texas Supreme Court reverses injunction barring investigations of parents of transgender children for child abuse