The Trump veto threat changed the stimulus package very little

Washington — As an exercise of raw presidential power, it was the flop. As a political tactic, it backfired. And as a coder for his last few weeks, President Trump’s threat of rejecting the $ 900 billion Covid bailout and government funding bill underscores his turbulent tenure in the oval office. I just did it.

Mr. Trump effectively held the country hostage for five days before Christmas, delayed the extension of the unemployment allowance for millions of unemployed Americans, postponed the delivery of $ 600 checks, and allowed the government to shut down. I hung my sex. Even when authorities competed to distribute the coronavirus vaccine.

And he built a cave.

After calling the bill “humiliation” and mocking the check “slightly,” the president signed the bill on Sunday night, claiming he had won a concession from Congress in the process, and voted to increase personal payments to $ 2,000. Including. But in reality, Mr. Trump has achieved only a few face-saving pledges that do nothing to substantially change bipartisan law.

“This is another example of President Trump’s story,” said Michael Steele, a spokesman for Ohio Republican John Bener, when Mr. Bener was Speaker of the House. “He achieved a few more days of turmoil at the end of the chaotic presidential office.”

The veto threat was the latest attention-grabbing operation by the president, who seems reluctant to accept the reality that Washington is proceeding without him. Mr. Trump had only 23 days left and at least tried to regain what he still seemed to dominate the fate of the country, but failed.

On Monday, Democrats tested the president’s request to increase payments for individual stimulus measures to $ 2,000 in a House vote. It aims to get approval for the high payments that have long been endorsed by the Democrats, or to reject the Republicans and oppose Mr. Trump. Voting reached two-thirds of the majority required to pass the House of Representatives, with 44 Republicans supporting the effort.

It is unclear whether the Senate will entertain such measures. Senators are resisting higher payments because of concerns about a federal budget deficit, and Senator Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican and majority leader, said in a statement Sunday that $ 2,000. The procedure of the chamber he controls who did not mention payment or the next president’s claim.

Mr. Trump’s threat to abandon the Covid bailout bill, which took months for lawmakers to agree, typically took place in a dramatic way. On December 22, the president 4-minute video to Twitter He breathlessly ridiculed foreign aid spending and other examples of what he called “pork” in a bill negotiated with the Democrats in Congress by his own Treasury Secretary and Republicans.

“That’s really shameful,” he said, citing spending he approved on his own budget, and falsely claiming that the law “has little to do with Covid.”

He followed up on a few days of tweets and asked lawmakers “Increase payments to people” And stop billions of dollars with “pork”. It was a series of cliffs that made the country endure in the spring of 2018 when Republicans succeeded in speaking to the president from his threat of refusing to spend $ 1.3 trillion.

Two of Capitol Hill’s closest allies, South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham and Republican Congressman Kevin McCarthy, have tried to convince the president to resign and sign the bill, so they’re on holiday. It happened again on the weekend.

Graham lobbyed Trump directly during a Christmas golf round at the Presidential Club in West Palm Beach, Florida. McCarthy spent hours talking to Trump on the phone trying to ease much of Sunday. Conversational officials said the president’s concerns, even when he recovered from elbow surgery.

But Mr. Trump’s decision to sign the bill avoided the disaster of a government shutdown in the midst of a pandemic killing more than 1,000 Americans a day, but even Republicans veto him. Had a hard time understanding how the threat of the veto achieved what was positive for the president or his party.

At a practical level, he got very little.

In a statement issued after signing the bill, Mr. Trump claimed that he “requested many revocations.” This is a parliamentary jargon that requires the president of Congress to allow him to cut spending that he finds no longer needed.

But, as Mr. Trump discovered when he tried a similar tactic in 2018, it only works if the president can win bipartisan support. (Several Republicans in the Senate voted against Mr. Trump’s $ 15 billion revocation request that year.)

On Sunday, New York Democrat and House of Representatives Expenditure Commissioner Nita M. Lowy revealed that the president’s efforts would be unsuccessful.

“The House Expenditure Commission has jurisdiction over the revocation, and a majority of Democrats reject the revocation submitted by President Trump,” she said in a statement.

Mr. Trump said the House and Senate “agreeed to focus strongly on the very serious fraudulent votes that took place” in the 2020 elections. In fact, the Democratic House of Representatives is certain to ignore the charges. And even the Senate has little willingness to join the president’s fraudulent crusade.

Republican leaders called on Senators this month to accept the results of the election and personally call on them not to participate in some House Republican-led efforts.

And Congress is unlikely to accept Mr. Trump’s call to remove protection from social media companies. He claimed that Section 230 allowed websites to censor conservative views, but the data show a conservative personality and publishers often thrive online.

Concerns about Section 230 are bipartisan, but it is unlikely that lawmakers will reach an agreement on this issue within next week. Mr. Trump and his allies have yet to find substantial commonalities with Democrats who primarily want changes to deal with discriminatory advertising and terrorist content online.

Politically, the president’s veto threat only helped put Republican allies on the House and Senate hotsheets.

In the House of Representatives, Republicans eager to reject a $ 2,000 stimulus check simply took it as an idea created by Democratic Chairman Nancy Pelosi, who quickly grabbed the president’s words to pass a bill to increase direct payments. I couldn’t ridicule him. Those who wanted to vote against more money had to oppose their president and the voters who supported him.

Texas representative Kevin Brady, a top Republican on the Ways and Means Commission, complained on the house floor that the proposal was “rushed to us at the last minute” and helped those who needed it most. not.

“I’m worried that this $ 436 billion won’t do what it needs to do, stimulate the economy, or help workers get back to work,” Brady said.

In the Senate, the president’s five-day moan only confused the Republican position on carefully coordinated direct payments with senior members of the Trump administration.

During the months of negotiations, Senate Republicans resisted an increase in payments of more than $ 600 because of concerns over the federal budget deficit. It is unclear whether the Senate will vote to increase the size of the check.

Mr. Trump claimed in a $ 2,000 check that “the Senate will begin the voting process.” In the legislative term governing the Senate, it is far from guaranteeing a higher amount of approval.

Republican strategist Brendan Bach, who was senior adviser to Paul Ryan in Wisconsin when he was Speaker of the House, is deeply enthusiastic about the Republican Party’s desire to take on the president’s cause and increase incentives. He said he was skeptical. And Mr. Buck said that there was little time for it to happen anyway.

“It’s not based on reality: substance, politics, and watches. It’s not possible,” he said. “He feels like he’s completely in a cave without getting anything. I don’t know why.”

During his four years at the White House, Mr. Trump has had some success in bending Congress to his will. He worked with Republicans to push for a $ 1.5 trillion tax cut in 2017. His Republican ally in the Senate has identified a record number of federal judges, including three new judges in the Supreme Court.

But the threat of rejecting the Covid bailout was an ultimately futile movement that helped strengthen Mr. Trump’s legacy.

David McCave Contribution report.

The Trump veto threat changed the stimulus package very little

Source link The Trump veto threat changed the stimulus package very little

Back to top button