Three, two, one … Arizona high schools to weigh adopting a shot clock for basketball – Tucson, Arizona

Tucson, Arizona 2021-06-08 13:30:00 –

Phoenix — Mo

Click to enlarge

Alex Menendez / Getty Images via Cronkite News

Young people who have played basketball in the park or on the driveway probably pretended to hit high stakes shots at the same time as the buzzer sounded. If the state moves forward with a 35-second shot clock, it can happen more often during a basketball game at Arizona High School.

National Federation of State High Schools Announced Eight states, including California, Washington, and New York, completed watch testing throughout the season before adding a new shot clock adoption option in May. The data and information collected from these states through the survey was provided to NFHS, which led to the decision. Recruitment options allow state high school associations to choose whether to introduce shot clocks in the 2022-2023 season.

Karrisa Niehoff, Executive Director of the NFHS, said the first vote by the Rules Committee would allow the recruitment option 11 to 1.

NFHS rules have historically banned states from using shot clocks at the high school level, and state associations lose their seats on the rules committee if used by schools. Currently, state associations remain on the committee regardless of what options they decide on.

Arizona was not one of the eight states that had previously tested shot clocks, so the Arizona Interdisciplinary Association plans to build from preliminary data and collect data thoroughly during the next year. 2022 -2023 As the season.

AIA Assistant Director Joe Paddock said the association seeks insights from schools, athletic directors and coaches.

“If the school supports it, of course, we will support the school and implement a shot clock,” Paddock said.

With the help of Phoenix Sports Event Management Company Monarch Sports Arizona, AIA has begun a preliminary study on the implementation of shot clocks. Visit Mesa Challenge During the 2018-19 season. The four-day event at Mesa Mountain View High School was attended by 16 out-of-state schools and local schools such as Sunny Slope, Chaparral, Rancho Solano and Corona del Sol.


Corona del Sol coach Neil McDonald said adding a shot clock at the high school level was a logical move.

“I absolutely agree,” McDonald said. “I think we need to catch up with the rest of the basketball world …. Obviously, college students and pros are playing with shot clocks, so we do that. I think it makes sense. ”

McDonald’s said shot clocks could create more exciting games and help coaches and players develop better strategies in the last few minutes of the game. He said that without a shot clock for those few minutes, the winning team by a few points could simply keep the ball away from the opponent until the end of the game. However, adding a shot clock requires the team to play faster, limiting the chances of wasting time.

Brian Jessner, AIA’s State Commissioner, led a research team that collects data from the tournament.

“I don’t think it’s necessary in high school for a variety of reasons,” says Gessner. “It will have little effect. I don’t have the same opinion as the coaches.”

Gesner, who has been the official basketball player for 30 years in Arizona,
He is a member of the NFHS Basketball Rules Committee. During the Visit Mesa Challenge, he explored how shot clocks affected the game in terms of logistical support for schools, officers, coaches, and players.

“There are literally tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of views of the data collected by the NFHS, with an average holding time of 15.8 seconds,” says Gessner.

By using less than half the time allotted by shot clocks, Gessner said, “This is a shiny new toy,” and ultimately a small, untalented team could suffer. Stated.

“I think we can get great results with the introduction of shot clocks. Talented teams only destroy untalented teams,” says Gessner.

One of the concerns raised through the survey was how it would affect players under development.

“What I’ve heard so far was the concern that shot clocks could create a sense of urgency, especially at the development level, perhaps at the freshman or JV level, which could affect executions on the court,” Niehoff said. ..

MacDonald said he doesn’t find it difficult for young players to add shot clocks. Rather, it’s a way for them to develop and learn skills early on.

“Young freshmen and JV teams will expect some areas to struggle no matter what,” McDonald said. “If you use shot clocks at college level, do it at JV and freshman levels. I think we need to use it. We need to give them the opportunity to play in the same environment they play at college level. ”

According to McDonald’s, the coaches are already preparing to attack the players.

“If a young group is having a hard time getting to the offense, just because they don’t have a shot clock doesn’t mean they won’t get it anyway,” McDonald said. “That’s what you’re already doing.” Must be one. ”

Coaches seem to prefer shot clocks, but sports directors are split 50-50, according to Paddock.

Paddock states that one reason for that “50 to 50 split” is the logistics for adding shot clocks. The adoption rule requires two devices with different horns attached to a different device than the game clock. Adding a shot clock also means paying to install it, and often requires hiring and training staff. Referees also need to be trained in how to handle shot clocks. Paddock said the AIA doesn’t yet have a clear figure on its cost, but Gessner estimates that the total cost per shot clock is between $ 2,000 and $ 5,000.

Many of the big schools in the valley want shot clocks, Paddock said. The NFHS adoption option allows states to create guidelines and specific rules for adding shot clocks. For example, large schools start using shot clocks and smaller schools do not. Men’s and women’s teams can take different approaches. Paddock said the choice of these types will be decided by the AIA after more information has been gathered.

Many states are promoting national rules for shot clocks at the high school level. However, Nihoff said the move from a shot clock ban to national rules is a big leap.

“The idea is to give the state the opportunity to do it if it thinks it’s really important and has the means to do it,” Niehoff said. “The national rule of having to use a shot clock suddenly causes a challenging philosophical thing. There is a need for equipment, training, staffing, and some state associations are ready. It may not be. ”

Nihoff said the NFHS is a “member-led organization” and that all new or modified rules are initially from members and go through multiple committees for approval. This process allows state associations, sports directors, officers and coaches to submit changes and proposals for new rules. Voting is then done by the NFHS Rules Committee, another committee called the Rule Review Committee, and finally the Board of Directors.

“Will members participate in national shot clocks in principle? Who knows,” Niehoff said. “It’s a very disruptive issue in history, so it’s very important that we’ve reached the level of state adoption options.”

Three, two, one … Arizona high schools to weigh adopting a shot clock for basketball Source link Three, two, one … Arizona high schools to weigh adopting a shot clock for basketball

Back to top button