President Donald Trump arrives on Air Force One at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport in Detroit, Michigan.
Jonathan Ernst | Reuters
A federal judge in Pennsylvania rejected legal efforts on Saturday to block millions of votes in the state from President Donald Trump’s campaign. The proof is expected to confirm the victory of President-elect Joe Biden.
The judge’s bitter decision is a devastating blow to Trump’s already very long-term bid to invalidate enough votes in multiple states to overturn the victory of former Democratic Vice President Joe Biden in the presidential election.
The Trump campaign and its allies have now lost or withdrawn more than 30 proceedings that were part of their efforts.
Judge Matthew Blanc of the U.S. District Court said in his written decision granting a request to dismiss the Pennsylvania proceedings, a lawyer in a campaign led by former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani said, “A convincing law. He said he did not provide “de facto evidence of controversy and rampant corruption.” With an unprecedented bid to invalidate millions of votes.
“Instead, the court has been presented with a tense legal debate without merit or speculative accusations, has not been filed in the proceedings and is not supported by evidence,” Bran Humed.
“In the United States, this cannot justify the deprivation of civil rights by a single voter, not to mention all voters in the sixth most populous state. Our people, laws, and institutions are more. Request. “
At some point, the judge was “unplannedly spliced” from two separate theories to avoid the votes being rejected separately, so that the votes were counted as “Frankenstein’s monsters.” Compared the allegations of the proceedings that voters were denied equal protection because of legal precedent.
Bran’s ruling discusses the question of whether he would bother to hold a preliminary hearing if Trump’s campaign had to provide an example of inappropriate voting to justify their claim. did.
The Trump campaign said it would seek a swift appeal of Bran’s decision in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, and his decision “helps our strategy” for the United States to hear the overall allegations of fraudulent voting. I believed. Supreme Court.
“We do not fully agree with this opinion, but we are grateful that the judge appointed by Mr. Obama has swiftly made this expected decision rather than simply trying to run out of time. “Jurani and Jenna Ellis, senior legal advisors to the campaign, said. statement.
Bran was appointed to the seat by President Barack Obama in 2012, but was previously a Republican executive in Keystone and was unanimously confirmed by members of the US Senate’s Republicans, Democrats, and Independents.
His ruling came four days after Republican presidential attorney Giuliani claimed in court for the first time in decades, without evidence that Trump was the victim of “widespread national fraud.”
Mark Alontic, a lawyer for several county election commissions whose voting process was questioned in the proceedings, accused Giuliani of talking about a “fantasy world.”
“This is shameful!” Alontic spoke at a hearing about Giuliani’s claim.
Bran seemed to say the same in his decision.
“Plaintiffs have asked the court to deprive the court of the rights of about 7 million voters,” the judge said.
“The court was unable to find a case in which plaintiffs sought such drastic relief in an election contest with respect to the huge amount of votes sought to be revoked,” Bran wrote.
“When seeking such an astonishing result, plaintiffs were formidably armed with compelling legal debates and de facto evidence of rampant corruption, and the court, despite its effects, proposed an injunction. You might expect to unfortunately have to admit the relief by. Have in such a large group of citizens.
“It didn’t happen,” Bran wrote.
Biden is currently projected to win 306 votes in the Electoral College, three dozen more than needed to win the White House race.
Trump refused to accept the contest because he, Giuliani, and other Trump agents falsely claimed he had won the election.
Twenty Pennsylvania electoral votes were at stake on Saturday’s proceedings, which Biden will receive after winning 50% of the popularity polls, compared to 48.8% for Trump. Biden has a margin of more than 80,000 votes against Trump with the current number of votes.
The court’s ruling came the day after Georgia approved the election results. This shows that Biden won after counting the ballots by hand.
It was also the day after the Republican chairman of the Michigan State Capitol and the Republican majority leader of the state’s Senate said Biden’s victory in their state seemed justified.
A joint statement by Chairman Lee Chatfield and leader Mike Sharkey says that after visiting the White House at Mr. Trump’s invitation, the president will overturn Michigan’s election results and take steps in Congress to approve the slate. It was expected to put pressure on it. The number of electors who vote for Trump in the Electoral College.
“We have not yet been informed of any information that could change the outcome of an election in Michigan. As legislative leaders, as we said throughout this election, we follow the law and the normal process for Michigan electors. I will comply, “Michigan State Congressman said in a statement.
“The Michigan certification process must be a deliberate process without threats or intimidation,” the statement said.
“The candidate with the most votes wins elections and Michigan electoral votes. These are the simple truths that should give confidence to our elections.”
Trump loses proceedings to prevent Biden’s victory in Pennsylvania
Source link Trump loses proceedings to prevent Biden’s victory in Pennsylvania