Tulsa Race Massacre lawsuit moves forward with narrowed focus – Tulsa, Oklahoma

Tulsa, Oklahoma 2022-08-05 11:15:13 –

TULSA, Oklahoma — A Tulsa County judge has narrowed a case brought by Greenwood Justice, an organization that sued several city groups following the 1921 Tulsa race massacre.

Greenwood’s legal counsel said Judge Caroline Wall’s ruling provides a framework for how to move forward.

Attorney Michael Swartz says the crux of their case lives on.

“I would like to emphasize that I am very pleased with the court’s decision,” Swartz said.

Swartz says it could take the next step hitherto unfulfilled when it comes to getting justice for the victims of the Race Massacre.

“We collected evidence, collected documents, took depositions, and got to the root of what really happened in the massacre,” Swartz said.

The ruling by Judge Caroline Wall was announced late Wednesday. Attorneys can amend petitions for relief.

Attorney Damario Solomon Simmons said, “Mitigation is for the repair and reconstruction of what was lost due to the genocide.

Solomon-Simmons, founder of Justice for Greenwood, says the massacre has become a public nuisance. Solomon Simmons says that his three remaining survivors, Lessy Benningfield Randall, Viola Fletcher, and Hughes Van Ellis, have the ability to move forward, and that the slaughter causes nuisance and reduces that nuisance. You will get the chance to prove that you have to.

“We keep in mind that the three plaintiffs we have, the three surviving survivors of the massacre, are all over the age of 100,” said Solomon Simmons. We are indebted to them and the community has an obligation to move forward as soon as possible.

The judge has dismissed several parts of the case, as have some defendants and plaintiffs. Only three people.

The historic Vernon AME Church was ruled out of the case by a judge. According to court documents, “the Court has ruled that the named plaintiff, ‘Historic Vernon AME Church, Inc.’, is ineligible to bring action in this matter.”

“I think it would have been appropriate to decide during the litigation, but I don’t think it would have been appropriate to decide before we got there.

Another part that was denied was the allegation of “ongoing public nuisance” resulting from the massacre.

Court papers stated, “With regard to the ‘ongoing’ pollution claims for events in the decades following the 1921 Tulsa race massacre, the Court found that these ‘ongoing’ pollution claims were found that it must be prejudged and dismissed because it is seeking relief that violates the law, the separation of powers enshrined in the Oklahoma Constitution.”

Greenwood attorneys have until September 2 to file an amended petition. The lawyer hopes to complete the petition by that date.

Trending Stories:

Stay in touch with us anytime, anywhere –

Tulsa Race Massacre lawsuit moves forward with narrowed focus Source link Tulsa Race Massacre lawsuit moves forward with narrowed focus

Back to top button