U.S. Supreme Court judges are willing to put a new curb on abortion

A conservative judge in the US Supreme Court is willing to impose new restrictions on abortion in the state in a groundbreaking case that could change the long-standing precedent that allows women to end their pregnancy. Showed that it may not be.

Wednesday’s U.S. Supreme Court challenges the right to abortion across generations as Mississippi seeks to overturn the 1973 groundbreaking Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationwide. I heard an oral discussion about.

At the heart of the case is the 2018 Mississippi law prohibiting abortion after 15 weeks. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Only the rest of the abortion clinic Republican-led states are trying to stop legislation.

The lower court considered it unconstitutional and blocked the ban. But in May, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the Mississippi proceedings. The ruling is scheduled by June 2022, just months before the midterm elections.

Anti-abortion activists have been campaigning to get Roe back for years. The Mississippi proceedings are the first opportunity to challenge the long-standing case since Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh were elected Supreme Court by former President Donald Trump.

Scott Stewart, Secretary of State for Mississippi, said in his opening remarks: [an issue], It belongs to people. “

Cabano seems to sympathize with Mississippi’s claim that the Constitution is neutral on the issue of abortion, so the Supreme Court can “return to a neutral position” and leave the issue “to the people, the state.” It looked like.

Barrett did not “care” for the burden that the “safe shelter law”, which allows women to let go of newborn children in certain places, claims that the clinic is caused by compulsory parent-child relationships. Seemed to challenge the lawyer representing the clinic when questioning.

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, appointed by former President George W. Bush, who became the central swing vote in the split court, may question the concept of “feasibility” and completely overturn Law. Instead, he showed that it could be open to fine-tuning the rules.

Roe said the state cannot ban abortion before the foetation becomes “survivable” or can survive outside the womb. This feasibility line is usually considered to be 24-28 weeks. Mississippi called on the Supreme Court to dismiss the rule and described it as “unfounded.”

Julie Riquelman of the Center for Reproductive Rights Center, who claimed on behalf of the Jackson Clinic, said there was no “principle than feasibility” line because it was “objectively verifiable.”

She warned that the Mississippi 15-week ban was “totally unconstitutional” and that eroding the right to abortion would “retreat women.”

Liberal Judges have expressed concern about the court’s official image if it overturns or modifies the case set in Roe.

“Can this institution survive the stench it creates in the general perception that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts?” Asked Sonia Sotomayor, appointed former President Barack Obama. rice field.

Increasingly conservative tendencies in the High Court have bolded Republican-led states like Texas that have passed. One of the most restrictive laws The country bans abortions six weeks after many women become pregnant, except for rape and incest.The Supreme Court under consideration Whether to temporarily block the law while the legal objection is in progress.

According to the CRR, if the court supports Mississippi, nearly half of the U.S. states are poised to outlaw abortion under a law that includes a “trigger” clause that automatically takes effect if Law overthrows. I am preparing.

The case highlights decades of deeply polarized debate over the right to abortion in the United States. Protesters from both sides gathered outside the Supreme Court early Wednesday morning, and the two rallies were separated by railings.

Carroll, a 53-year-old woman who didn’t reveal her family tree, flew from Indiana and said, “Become a voiceless person and save lives.” “I’m a Christian, and I’m a Christian.” I believe the Bible says that God knitted us together in the womb. “

Olivia Woods, Ohio, a 24-year-old organizer of URGE (Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity), a reproductive rights organization focused on colored races and the queer community, said overthrowing Roe would be a “violence”. Stated.

“It will be a massive devastation that will hurt all over the country,” she said.

US public opinion supports current legislation, with 70% of US adults and two-thirds of US Catholics being surveyed. Pyu In 2019, they said they didn’t want to see Roe capsize.

U.S. Supreme Court judges are willing to put a new curb on abortion

Source link U.S. Supreme Court judges are willing to put a new curb on abortion

Back to top button