Wife adjusts husband’s mask before entering a store in Hampshire, England
Peter Titmuss | Collection Mix: Subject | Getty Images
London — The UK government’s approach to tackling the outbreak of the coronavirus at the start of the pandemic has been described as one of the worst public health failures in history in the country, as investigated by British legislators.
A report examining Britain’s first response to Covid’s pandemic found that the government made a major mistake at the onset of the global epidemic. “And hesitate to blockade the country.
“The blockade and social distance determination in the early weeks of the pandemic, and the advice that led to them, are ranked as one of the most important public health failures the UK has ever experienced. It was discovered on Tuesday following an investigation by two parliamentary commissions, a 150-page report published.
The British government, led by Prime Minister Boris Johnson, has been accused of dithering after a Covid pandemic struck Europe in early 2020 and is reluctant to impose restrictions on public life, travel and borders. I saw.
Although never officially announced, the UK’s first approach to Covid (from an attempt to “contain” the spread of the virus to an attempt to “delay” it) is widely seen as a way to achieve “herd immunity.” Was there.
High levels of immunity to the virus in the population can be achieved by both natural infection (by forming antibodies when the body fights the virus) and vaccination.
The latter route is generally preferred because it avoids adverse effects such as excessive viral death. However, due to the lack of a Covid vaccine available at the start of the pandemic, some countries, such as the United Kingdom and Sweden, appear to support the spread of the virus to some extent in the population to achieve herd immunity levels. is. ..
This strategy rapidly spread cases of Covid-19 throughout the UK, but killed thousands of older people and burdened the National Health Service. The British government (and later Sweden, to a lesser extent) changed its tack and imposed a national blockade on March 26.
A survey that included evidence from more than 50 “witnesses,” including prominent civil servants and health professionals who advised the government through a pandemic, was terrible in assessing the government’s first approach. Unlucky pursuit of herd immunity.
“When the government moved from the’containment’stage to the’delay’ stage, the approach involved trying to control, rather than completely stop, the spread of Covid throughout the population. This actually resulted in accepting the immunity of the herd due to the infection. This was an unavoidable result, given the lack of solid prospects for vaccines in the UK, limited testing capacity, and widespread belief that the public would not accept the blockade for a considerable period of time. “
By doing this, the United Kingdom “made a serious early mistake in adopting this deadly approach and was more focused on stopping the spread of the virus used in many East and Southeast Asian countries. And did not consider a rigorous approach. “
Healthcare professionals will take the patient from an ambulance to the Royal London Hospital in London on January 19, 2021.
Torga Acmen | AFP | Getty Images
The report states that the fact that the UK approach reflects a consensus between official scientific advisers and the government “was not open to approaches taken elsewhere where we should be. He added that it indicates “meaning” and “some degree of groupthink.”
A study overseen by the House of Commons Science and Technology Commission and the Health and Social Welfare Commission (consisting of members of three major UK political parties) covered six key areas of the state’s response to Covid-19. I investigated. These included how the UK was prepared for a pandemic and the willingness to use non-pharmaceutical interventions such as border control, social distance and blockade to control the pandemic.
We also looked at testing, tracking, the use of isolation strategies, the impact of pandemics on social care and specific communities, and finally the procurement and deployment of the Covid-19 vaccine.
Emphasizing the findings, he concluded that the study found the following:
- “Delays in establishing proper testing, tracking, and quarantine systems have hampered efforts to understand and contain the outbreak and have failed its intended purpose of avoiding blockages.”
- “The first decision to delay the comprehensive blockade reflected the fatalism of the Covid epidemic that should have been firmly challenged at the time, despite practices elsewhere in the world.”
- “In the early stages of the pandemic, social care was not given sufficient priority.”
- “Positive planning, agility, and decisive organization for vaccine development and deployment efforts” is a big positive and should guide future government practices.
In addition, the study found that the UK’s pandemic readiness was widely evaluated in advance, but was actually less successful than in many other countries. The pandemic also emphasized the need for an urgent and long-term strategy to address health inequality.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who wore a face mask to prevent the spread of the coronavirus, visited a pharmaceutical facility during his visit to northeastern England on February 13, 2021.
WPA Pool | Getty Images News | Getty Images
Nonetheless, the report and examples of “global best practices” are also bright, with the UK ordering, approving, and deploying Covid vaccines in most countries with government procurement and rapid deployment. Was praised by. to date, According to government data, 85.5% of the UK population over the age of 12 Fully vaccinated, booster shots have been deployed to the most vulnerable people.
The UK has been severely hit by a pandemic, recording more than 8.2 million cases of the virus and more than 138,000 deaths. Critics argue that inadequate government response in several areas of the pandemic, such as testing and tracing systems that have been plagued during the pandemic, has cost thousands of lives. ..
In that conclusion, the survey must be reflected to ensure that lessons are learned, hoping that both the positive and negative consequences of the government’s response to the pandemic will help in the future response to emergencies. Note that it will not be.
Parliamentarians said a total of 38 recommendations could be equipped in the UK, including calling for “expanding the diversity of expertise and challenges” at home and abroad to support future pandemic planning.
The UK’s response “combined some major achievements with some major mistakes,” said the chairs of the two parliamentary committees that oversaw the investigation, issuing a joint statement summarizing the findings.
“Our vaccine program was boldly planned and implemented effectively. Our test and trace program took too long to be effective. The government gave serious scientific advice. Taken, but there must have been more challenges to the early British consensus that delayed a more comprehensive lockdown. Countries like South Korea have shown that different approaches are possible. ” Told.
They admitted that it was “impossible to do everything right” because so much was unknown at the beginning of a public health emergency, from the NHS and civil servants to the scientific community and millions. I thank all the departments, including volunteers. In one of our darkest times, the challenge of dedication, compassion, and hard work to help the whole country. ”
UK “Herd Immunity” Covid Strategy “Public Health Failure”: Contact Us
Source link UK “Herd Immunity” Covid Strategy “Public Health Failure”: Contact Us