Washington, District of Columbia 2021-06-11 23:37:33 –
Northern Virginia’s school system challenges the judge’s order to revive suspended PE teachers at the school board in response to a proposal requiring transgender students to respond with the synonym of hope. I will file a complaint.
WTOP-FM reports that Loudoun County Public School said in a statement Friday that it “respectfully opposed” the decision and appealed the decision to the Virginia Supreme Court.
“Many students and parents at Leesburg Elementary School have expressed fear, hurt and disappointment at coming to school,” the statement said. It “respects the rights of public school employees to free speech and the free exercise of religion, but those rights do not exceed the rights of students to be educated in a supportive and nurturing environment.” ..
Judge James Prouman of the Loudon County Circuit Court ruled on Tuesday that he was exercising his right to freedom of speech when Dr. Tanner Cross told the board that he could not follow his religious belief-based proposal. did. His order demanded an immediate return of Cross until a full trial was held.
Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal group, sued the county school board last week and filed an emergency injunction on behalf of Leesburg Elementary teacher Cross. Cross was suspended after a school board meeting on May 25, after stating that teachers could not comply with the proposed rules requiring transgender students to be treated in the gender of their choice.
“I’m a teacher, but I serve God first, and because it’s against my religion, I affirm that a biological boy can be a girl and vice versa. It’s lying to the child. It’s abuse of the child, “Cross said in a hearing.
The school board is considering new regulations, along with state obligations that require all school systems to update their policies on transgender students. The model rules distributed by the state include the requirement that students deal with the preferred pronoun.
According to Stacy Haney, a lawyer representing the school system, state law does not allow the school board to implement the policy, and existing school board rules already prohibit discrimination based on gender identity. I will. That means Cross had expressed rebellion to follow existing school policies, she said.
The school system also claimed that the cross was stopped because his remarks caused confusion at the school without expressing his beliefs.
The turmoil of that scale did not justify punishing teachers for exercising their right to free speech, Cross lawyer ADF Tyson Langhofer argued last week. Plowman agreed.
In a statement, Langhofer said the opinion was “a legitimate application of these facts to well-established legislation.”
“I am confident that if the Virginia Supreme Court hears the appeal, it will support the Circuit Court’s decision,” Langhofer said.
Virginia School District to Appeal Teacher’s Return After Transgender Remark – NBC4 Washington Source link Virginia School District to Appeal Teacher’s Return After Transgender Remark – NBC4 Washington