The President of the United States and one of the most powerful companies in the United States are like spouses involved in the debate over dirty socks. They are avoiding the real problem.
Last week with President Biden Facebook A war of words continues over false alarms about vaccines. Each side took an extreme position to divert them and us from deeper problems: Americans are very divided It’s difficult to even tackle our problems. This is seen in pandemics, climate change, violent crimes and more.
My desire for all of us, elected leaders, and the technology companies that mediate our discourse is to continue to stick to what everyone can do to find a common foundation.
To summarize the grudge match: President Biden late last week Said Internet networks like Facebook “kill people” because he believes he’s not doing enough to stop the spread of misleading information about Covid-19 and viral vaccines. Stated.Facebook Shoot back He said he helped save lives by amplifying reliable coronavirus information, and that the White House is trying to distract blame for missing vaccination goals.
President Biden Walked back his provocative wordsHowever, the White House continued to pressure Facebook to do more, including providing information about the spread of false alarms on social networks.My colleague Sheila Frenkel reported: Facebook doesn’t really have this data, Partly because the company isn’t trying to find it.
Are you still tired? I.My ex-colleague Charlie Wozel Called this “A great example of flattened discourse influenced by social media that is poisoning us all.”
Like my colleague Cecilia Kang, Facebook and the White House are both a little right and wrong. Said For this week’s daily.
On the White House side, officials Subtle suggestions from surgeons in general To improve health information, including recommendations for government officials and social media companies. It was basically forgotten after the president and other officials began subtle blame on Facebook.
Facebook is also a little right and wrong.Mark Zuckerberg said in interview If there are more than zero crimes announced Thursday, the general public does not consider the police station a failure. This means that Facebook can’t be expected to get rid of all the bad news and incitement to violence. It’s fair to say, how Zuckerberg and our others think of acceptable levels of misinformation and other malicious behavior on the site, and how the company measures success. Ask questions about what you are doing.
But if Facebook did more to admit the offensive truth, it would help: Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter play an important role in communicating to the general public. When By misleading the public.. It’s also useful if you just say aloud what Sheila reported — you can’t answer White House’s questions without knowing the spread of misleading coronavirus information on social networks.
That analysis is what information is online, as Facebook’s (lately) self-assessment of Russia’s propaganda before and after the 2016 US elections improved our collective knowledge of foreign impact campaigns. It helps to improve our collective understanding of how it spreads.
But even if Facebook tells us how misleading information about the coronavirus is spreading tomorrow, Americans will discuss the meaning of the data and what to do with it.
And we’re fighting the same battle about who blames false information, the limits of freedom of expression, and whether social platforms are too much or too little to control what is being said on their site. I repeat.
The basic problem is that they have little in common. We all disagree on how to focus on the virus that killed more than 600,000 Americans, or how to balance preventative measures that disrupted people’s lives and the economy. We couldn’t agree on and how to delay climate change, Collectively deal with the results.. The only thing we can agree on is that the other side is unreliable.
Is this due to the business models and algorithms of social media companies, people trying to make money in a hurry, irresponsible politicians who play our emotions, or fear of getting sick or poverty? Yes.
It should not off-hook anyone or the company to foster an environment of distrust.But there is no easy answer as to what the false alarm researcher did Lenny Di Resta Called Problems of society as a whole..
That’s why the days of hustle and bustle between the White House and Facebook don’t take us anywhere. Stick to details such as argument scoring points and missing data, ignoring the much larger picture. I disagree with what is important. We do not trust each other. That is the real problem we need to solve.
Before going …
The rich in space: The Internet was once the exclusive territory of big government — until tech executives made it a place for billions of people.Currently engineers such as Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk I want to do the same in space, Written by my colleagues David Streitfeld and Erin Woo.
Related: This week’s Amazon founder’s space flight called Bezos “Sleepy Dorian Gray“Jacob Bernstein says.
Get ready to repair your own tractor! (if you want.) Federal Trade Commission voted for Support the principle of “right to repair” The idea that manufacturers of smartphones, home appliances and farm equipment should not restrict the purchase of parts and manuals for product repair. Large companies, including Apple and John Deere, are costing people and the planet by tightly controlling who can repair their products.
Look at the bear: We all deserve it Bear live web feed doing bears, Insider says.
Hug to this
It’s a horse. I am wearing horse suspenders.Made from human blue jeans..
We want to hear from you. Please tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you would like to see.You can reach us email@example.com.
What the battle over Facebook is missing
Source link What the battle over Facebook is missing