The Supreme Court upheld food giants Nestle and Cargill on Thursday, dismissing a lawsuit alleging that they had deliberately purchased cacao beans from an African farm that used child slave labor.
The judge ruled 8-1 that the Court of Appeals would improperly proceed with the proceedings against the food company. The two companies alleged that they had been sued by a group of six adults in Mali, taken from their country as children and forced to work on the adjacent cocoa farm in Côte d’Ivoire.
“Although the respondent’s injury occurred entirely abroad, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals may file a proceeding in federal court as the defendant company made a” major business decision “in the United States. I decided that I could do it. Thomas wrote a majority opinion in court.
The proceeding was dismissed twice early before being revived by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. When the case was discussed in December, then President Donald Trump’s administration supported Nestlé and Cargill.
Marian citizens “supported and beaten child slavery” by Minneapolis-based Cargill and Swiss-based Nestlé U.S. forces, especially by purchasing cocoa beans from child labor farms. Was insisted. The group has filed a lawsuit seeking a class action proceeding on their behalf. Also, they say thousands of other ex-child slaves.
Nestlé and Cargill have claimed that they have not done anything wrong throughout the incident and are taking steps to combat child slavery. In a post-judgment statement, Nestlé and Cargill reiterated their efforts to combat child labor in the cocoa industry.
The proceedings include the Alien Tort Statistic Act, which was first enacted by Parliament in 1789. The law allows foreigners to file proceedings in US courts for human rights abuses. But Mr Thomas said the proceedings were not properly filed in US courts.
“Almost all actions they say supported and supported forced labor, such as providing training, fertilizers, tools and cash to overseas farms, occurred in Côte d’Ivoire, but common decisions such as decision making. A petition for corporate activity alone cannot establish a domestic application. ATS, “he wrote.
“I was disappointed that the court delayed the client’s long quest for justice,” Paul Hoffman, a lawyer who filed a proceeding with Mali citizens in the High Court, said in a statement. But he said it wasn’t the end of the case. He requested the lower court to allow the group’s proceedings to be amended, and said Cargill and Nestle would claim that they “controlled the system of forced labor from the United States.”
The High Court in recent years has restricted the use of the Alien Tort Statistic Act. In 2018, the court ruled that foreign companies cannot file proceedings under the law. In that case, the court rejected attempts by Israeli victims of attacks on the West Bank and Gaza to use US courts to sue the Jordan-based Arab Bank.
The case is Nestle USAv. DoeI, 19-416, and Cargill Inc.v. DoeI, 19-453.
When claiming child slavery, the Supreme Court stands by Nestlé and Cargill
Source link When claiming child slavery, the Supreme Court stands by Nestlé and Cargill