USA

Whistleblowers take courage, but don’t expect Facebook to change the way | John Norton

MeIf you need a keen and fully modern whistleblower paragon, Frances Haugen Your woman She was a former Facebook employee and knew about some of the company’s products, especially the harm caused by Instagram, but did little or no because she prioritized growth and revenue above all else. Clarified.

A good resume is essential to establishing credit on your street, and Hogen checks every Silicon Valley box. Bachelor of Electrical Engineering? check. Harvard MBA? check. Do you specialize in algorithm management? check. Do you have experience and knowledge of ranking algorithms in many technology companies? Check (Google, Pinterest, Yelp). And of course, you’ll have a good deal of position in the company you’re whistling. Again, Haugen puts a checkmark in the box. On Facebook, she was the Chief Product Manager of a Citizen’s Misinformation Team dealing with democracy and false alarm issues.She later Worked on counterintelligence..

And finally, you need to give a lot of guilty evidence from your previous employer. Haugen did so too.In that sense, the whistleblower she is most similar to is Edward Snowden When he broke the cover in the summer of 2013, he also brought back a surprising amount of documents from his former employer, the National Security Agency (NSA). But after quitting Facebook, Hogen was able to do what Snowden couldn’t do at his disposal in 2013.

So what does Whistleblower 2.0 look like? Now that you’ve “stolen” thousands of internal documents and left the organization, you need to plan your game to get the most out of your courageous decision to publish. In an ideal world, media advisors would be lined up (it’s not clear if Haugen had it). You also need a website (she has).

Next, you need to team up with some heavyweight mainstream media to prevent messages from drowning due to mass spills from former employers. And it provides an appropriate cache of documents so they can. Evaluate them and plan a juicy bit drip feed over the next few days.On her side, Hogen The Wall Street Journal And that 60 minutes Network TV documentary strand. Both she was proud.

You also need to pass some documents to selected lawmakers and regulators so that you can handle the bubbles of curiosity and legitimate indignation. And when they schedule a hearing about your revelation, you will of course attend and become a star witness. This will trigger a similar invitation to testify in other jurisdictions. I am happy to accept all of these. And by doing all this, you will dramatically improve the chances of the world hearing about the skull your ex-employer was standing up against.

Oh – and one more: It’s important to have some kind of positive message so that the cynical world doesn’t conclude that you’re as bitter and twisted as your former employer insists. .. Haugen also has a check in that box. “Francis basically believes,” her website says. “The problems we face today with social media are solvable. We can have social media that brings out the best in humanity.”

If this sounds like a criticism of Hogen, I’m not going to do so. No one has ever thought that whistleblowers are easy. Telling the truth to power requires courage, determination, and the ability to survive a media storm, and she has shown all three virtues. The bigger question is whether the whistleblower will do anything good, even if it is achieved as skillfully as she has ever managed. Does it lead to meaningful change?

take Snowdenin the case of. His revelation was truly sensational, revealing the incredible scale and inclusiveness of NSA’s (and its allies) electronic surveillance. It was clear that democratic surveillance of this surveillance in various Western countries was severely inadequate in the years following 9/11.

The revelation caused inquiries in many of those countries, but what actually happened? In the United States, there are very few. In the UK, after three separate investigations, there was a new parliamentary law. Investigatory Powers Act 2016, This replaced inadequate monitoring with slightly inadequate monitoring, giving security services a range of useful new powers.

Is it something different from Hogen’s revelation? My premonition is no, as Facebook still lacks the political will to tackle the surprisingly beneficial abuse. Haugen’s “Testimony Tour” (she comes to Congress here on Monday) will bring great copies and legislative grandeur. But her revelation says, “It has no effect on regulation. There are no new laws, no new regulations, no new challenges of damn value.” Write the Os key Wired..

The idea that good things happen when the truth is revealed, that is, regulators, business executives, and legislators ultimately rely on the right information to ensure that justice is done, is a myth. ..That is why the only system that can tame the following companies Facebook It is a dictatorship. And we aren’t there – not yet.

What i am reading

Use and abuse
Performance: How the word meaning was corrupted Nice little essay Wilfred M McRae Hedgehog review.

Not the first time
Facebook’s fall from Grace looks like Ford Intriguing historical considerations Mar Hicks Wired..

Too many good things
On the internet we are always famous parallel New Yorker essay According to Chris Hayes about the futileness of Internet abuse.

Whistleblowers take courage, but don’t expect Facebook to change the way | John Norton

Source link Whistleblowers take courage, but don’t expect Facebook to change the way | John Norton

Back to top button