Worst effects of climate change are with us now – Tulsa, Oklahoma

Tulsa, Oklahoma 2021-09-08 19:17:42 –

August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina Landing off the coast of Louisiana, floods broke through the embankments around New Orleans, causing a slow-moving disaster.Almost 2,000 people It was killed for weeks, hundreds of thousands of homes were destroyed, and the city was abandoned.Environmental scientist warning Katrina was a taste of what was prepared for the Gulf Coast region if climate change continued uncontrolled.

However, greenhouse gas emissions rise, And just 16 years after Katrina, Hurricane Aida Hit Louisiana as a Category 4 storm with maximum wind speeds from 150 mph 10 inches Leaving more than 1 million households in Louisiana, No power.. The wreckage of the storm went up the east coast, killing at least 15 people in flash floods. New York It damages houses and public transportation infrastructure.

Some media reports Embankment after Katrina The area around New Orleans remained intact, but the real story is Aida’s actions. Fits profile The number of storms fueled by the rapidly changing climate, and no embankment strong enough to provide adequate protection each year against such relentless hurricanes.

In the case of Kali Akuno, co-founder and co-director of Cooperation JacksonThe wreckage of Aida surrealistically reminds him of what he and others in the Gulf Coast region experienced 16 years ago.recently interview, Akuno said, “Unfortunately, painful memories come back.”As a former secretary general of People’s Hurricane Relief Fund Founded in the aftermath of Katrina (PHRF), Acno has witnessed the government’s inadequate response to such disasters.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) under the leadership of President George W. Bush Failed brilliantly Mutual aid groups such as PHRF have intervened to address the needs of Katrina’s victims and survivors. The same seems to be happening today, and Akno’s new Mississippi-based organization, Cooperating Jackson, is struggling to help refugees.

“The worst impacts of climate change are here now, and we need to build systems and infrastructure to address them,” says Akuno. But he said, “Everything we can collect only scratches the surface of our overall needs, and there must be broader systematic changes to address these crises in the future. I admit.

Satellite image It shows the shocking range of Gulf Coast devastation from Hurricane Aida. It remains to be seen whether President Joe Biden’s administration will respond more efficiently to the needs of Aida’s survivors than Bush’s response throughout Katrina. However, government response to climate-related disasters, though necessary, is part of a “downstream” solution centered on the symptoms of climate change.

Multiple “upstream” solutions to climate disasters include building resilience before a storm strikes, and most importantly, the causes of climate change need to be quickly mitigated. Since the Katrina disaster in 2005, few political leaders are willing to take strong action in that important respect.

At the same time, residents of Louisiana, Mississippi, and New York are facing fears of home damage, road flooding, and lack of electricity. Indigenous community In the Midwest, we are fighting pipelines that transport climate-changing fuels to our lands. The Embridge Line 3 pipeline has been upgraded to transport tar sands.The dirtiest fuel left on earth“-Beyond the pristine land Anishinaabe grows wild rice..

Minnesota estimates that the social and climatic impacts of the completed project are as follows: $ 287 billion in 30 years.. The last of our rapidly changing climate needs is yet another oil pipeline, but few leaders seem willing to interfere with the interests of fossil fuel companies.

“President Biden can now suspend Line 3,” said Tara Houska, founder of Giniw Collective. interview.. “All you need is a pen stroke.” Houska was part of Years of resistance movement For pipelines calling on Democratic leaders such as Biden and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz to stop the pipeline.

Despite their expressed approval of the dangers of climate change and the need to mitigate it, neither federal nor state leaders have taken action against the third line. “Houska says,” they still allow [fossil fuel] The industry continues to build and expand. “

Mr Akno is worried that the Republican Party, which has a worse record of climate change, will try to exploit the Democratic Party’s failure to regain parliamentary political control in 2022.Wing media trying to make this [Hurricane Ida] “Afghanistan.””

In just a few months, national leaders and members of civil society gathered in Glasgow, Scotland, known as the next United Nations Climate Change Conference. COP 26.. Mr. Akno is involved in the social movement’s response to the conference and does not hesitate to say that the Biden administration is simply not doing enough as a global participant. “We are deeply dissatisfied with the approach and direction they are taking towards the mitigation aspect of climate change,” he says.

Press release of the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report released in early August spellVery ominous warning:

“Many of the changes observed in climate are unprecedented in thousands of years, if not hundreds of thousands of years, and some of the changes that are already in motion, such as continued sea-level rise, are numbers. It is irreversible for hundreds to thousands of years. “

Hurricane Aida underscores the climate devastation we are facing, and the Line 3 pipeline offers an equally clear opportunity to do something about it. Nevertheless, Expressed commitment “Climate change efforts” to the governor of the Democratic Party Similar oath Both refuse to act.

Governor Waltz defense His support for the Line 3 project “I argued that I needed to stay away from fossil fuels and showed policy, but in the meantime, if it were to transport oil, it would be the same as us. You need to do it as safely as you can. Probably you can. ”Waltz faces massive opposition and says he will secure the transportation of fossil fuels, contrary to his own expressed desire to address the causes of climate change. It’s not clear why they feel a strong obligation. “Are we really? necessary To allow fossil fuel companies this? “Houska asked. It is not intended for Minnesota’s energy security. “

She is right Neither Biden nor Waltz, and certainly the people of Minnesota, or the entire United States, have gained anything of value from the Line 3 project. Instead, what’s at stake- Embridge CEO Armonaco’s words-“A lot of free cash flow” to the shareholders of the company.

but Infrastructure bill Parliamentarians are currently under debate, which is the centerpiece of this year’s Biden administration’s legislative agenda, and the climate mitigation aspect has hardly survived the aggressive deal between the two major parties. In other words, as the country is devastated by the actual effects of floods, droughts, wildfires, and other climate change, our political leaders will soon do something about greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels. I have no plans to do it.

As corporate interests continue to be valued more than our climate and species, Houska urges us to “fundamentally change the way we see our place in the world.” .. Taking a long view that our politicians can’t or don’t want to take, she reminds us that it’s far more important than corporate profits. You can’t live without clean water, clean air, and clean soil. “

Sonari Kolhatkar is the founder, host and executive producer of. “Stand up with Sonari” Freedom of speech TV and radio programs aired on Pacifica and Pacifica stations.She is a writing fellow Economy for everyone A project at the Independent Media Institute.

Source: Independent Media Institute

This article was created by Economy for everyone, Independent Media Institute project.

(Photo provider: NASA).

Worst effects of climate change are with us now Source link Worst effects of climate change are with us now

Back to top button