Researchers from Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon University recently learned about learning how to use the generative ari in the work affecting critical thinking skills. “Used technology incorrectly and resulting the results damaged faculty of cognitive faculty to be preserved,” Paper said. When people depend on the generative Ai on the workplace, the effort to verify that the AI responses is reasonable to be used, rather than using a higher critical thinking skill as creation, and analyzing information. If human only intervention when AI is not enough, the papers say, and the laborers are not able to do “a regular opportunity, leaving the exception.” With other words, when we rely so much for AI to think for us, we will be worse to solve problems that cannot do. In the study of 319 people, who reported using a generative Ai for at least once a week during work, the respondents asked to show three main categories: Creation email for colleagues, for example); information (research topics or summarize long articles); and advice (get instructions or create a chart from existing data). Then, he was asked that he did a critical thinking skill in order, and if using Ai generative makes him use more or less attempts to think of critical. For each job that is issued, he is also asked to show you how much you are in yourself, the generative, and the ability to evaluate AI output. About 36% of the participants reported that using critical thinking skills to reduce negative results that can reduce the results. One participant says that she uses ChatGPT to write performance reviews, but the dozen check out the output AI because he accidentally send him. The respondent is more reported that they should convert the email made of ai who will be sent to the leader – the culture of living better on hierarchys and the age will not do fit. And in many cases, a response participant is made from AI with a common web site from the source like youtube and Wikipedia, it may take purpose to use AI at the beginning. In order for workers offering a generative noi, they must know how it happens. But not all participants are familiar with the AI limit. “Harm Harm Harms Potential Resources can give Motivate to think critical, but only if the user consciously knows the harm,” Paper read. In fact, the study found that the participants reported their confidence in AI using less critical efforts than they are convinced to be confident. When the rice researchers said that the ai of the ai had made you a dumber, the study shows that the overrelis is in ai tool that can damage the problem.
Did AI make us silent?
