Thomson Reuters have won the first major Ai Case in the United States.in 2020, Media and Technology Conglomerate the Intelligence AI Ai Startup Ross. In the complaint, Thomson Reuters claimi AI material that produces from firm research law. Today, the judge ruled about the favor of Thomson who is not a copyrighted that the copyrighted is launched by Ross intelligence. “No defenses that can be done. I declined all,” I Know the district of Stephanos Bubbas whose company can use copyrighted materials, because many main tools are developed with training In copyrrers include books, movies, visual artwork, and websites. Currently, there are some twelve baskets present in the US court system, as well as international challenges in China, and other countries, Judge Bas reigned about fair use. The doctrine of fair use is an important component of AI companies seek themselves to affirm that the use of copyright illegal. The idea of using a fair use is sometimes legally able to use work that has the copyright without an example, to create a job parodi, or in a non-commercial or news production. When determines that the fair use of use, the court using the four factor test, the poetic, the amount of poetry, and the amount of work is used, and how the use of the original market. Thomson Reuters can be applied to two of the four factors, but the bibas reflects the fourths as the most important, and ruled with the marketplace. “Even before the markets of the market. The Cave off at 2021, consistently the cost of the litigation that still has a long financial company, according to the Professor AI cornell digital law and Internet James Grimmelmann: “If this decision is followed by a penrative company.” Brias decisions indicate the company’s generative company of the intellectual property, concass, which will condemn these ai company ‘ The argument is fair, even if it can vary depending on the plaintiff. “It puts his finger on a scale to hold a fair use of not applicable,” he said.
