Google got permission to sell e-books and audio directly for customers through iOS applications, Google Play books. When the iOS app can provide access to the content before purchasing elsewhere, like an e-book you buy through the website, the developer must get the user’s iOS to the company website to buy purchases. According to a brief posting on the Google Blog, the user will now be able to click the “Get Book” button on the Google Play Books iOS that will take the Google Play app or purchase purchase. File File: Google from there, the user will be able to see a list of recently opened books and complete the purchase using the Google account and the saved payment information. By processing the transactions on your own website, Google can avoid Apple commissions (generally 30%) in digital purchases. In addition, iOS users will be able to share books with family groups from Google Play groups, whether family members use iOS, Android, or web as a read or listening device. To allow this change, as if Google is applied to an external account entitlement, Japanese Commerce (JFTC) “Application designed mainly to provide access to several Digital content, such as magazines, books, audio, music, or videos. To use rights, developers must get additional approval from Apple and then follow the other rules about the website clicked, how the link is formatted, how the references in the app code, and others. It also determines that the user should see the full screen announcement, they are no transactions with Apple after clicking the external link. Netflix is one of the first to choose new rules on 2022 by creating a subscription through the website. Google does not explain why you just decided to offer direct purchases, but it may be waiting for the result of the lawsuit between the epic fortnite maker and Apple. The case is found that Apple is not a monoplitis, but confirmed that Apple should allow the instrument of the app to connect to its own website if selected. The High Court declined to listen to appeal in January 2024, leaving the original rule of the lower court to stand.
