Moon or mars? The US may choose to choose a difficult choice for future missions

Optimal fuel route for Mars included coming when both planets are approximately on the left side of the sun. This launch window repeats every 18 months, and the nine months travel time means a problem in space on other places where the crew has been revealed by the choices you can be delivered. The faster route can be reached (approximately six months) but this is an intensive very intense. From there. Of course the material for the gate should be sent to the moon gateway first. But it encourage energy requirements in a slower but more efficient way can be used for part of the Mars travel. But will they be able to bring the people in there and get back to you? As the company is a profitable profit will be a strong factor, along with safety asthronauts. We just have to see some more recent Boeing issues (Astronauts have been stuck at the international space station for seven months to write) to see if private companies may want to transport them. This will not happen, by influencing the white administration of the house, and the suggestion of the NASAacman privately (or consistently involved a Lunar gateway and the Target Mars and mainly dependent on Musical.Sumping are both sides may occur. Of course, Mars missions will be easier if the gate is already in the month. Timeles are participating here are important. Spacex states that it will send five-star that is not canceled to Mars next year with the purpose of deliberate in 2028. It is seen in orbit, but if the additional funding and the material can be taken faster than this. Moon gateway will be built in 2027, it will not work in 2028. It is a priority exploring Mars over our faster gateway may seek for the moon, other countries can explore in the place for easy A more easily launched route to Mars. This tends to be more time, but if the Musk failed to get humans in the next few years, the countries might have the edge.

Source link