USA

President Trump's lawyer orders redacting of witness information in classified documents case | Donald Trump

supervising federal judge donald trump's Lawyers for the former president were ordered to redact information about about 20 witnesses from the public version of court filings in a criminal case on charges of keeping classified documents, overturning an earlier ruling that did not allow such redactions. Overturned.

The ruling requires President Trump to instead use pseudonyms (e.g., Trump Official 1 or FBI Agent 1) when referring to people close to him or investigative personnel who may be the subject of harassment threats. means that it must be used.

However, although U.S. District Judge Eileen Cannon granted Special Counsel Jack Smith's main request, she used her order to reprimand prosecutors who filed motions for reconsideration, imposed new conditions, and The court ruled against the prosecution, which allowed its release.

Biggest defeat for prosecutors 24 page judgment The judge's decision allowed President Trump's public filings to include witness statements that are exempt from discovery and other substantive testimony unless they identify potential witnesses.

of dispute between judge and prosecutor over witnessesThe case has spilled over into other areas in recent weeks, leading prosecutors to threaten to appeal her ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, but the case is a sign that President Trump is seeking further evidence from prosecutors. It began in January after a request for disclosure documents.

The motion to compel was partially redacted and filed with 70 attachments, many of which were sealed and redacted. But Trump's lawyers asked for the sealed filings to be released because many of the names in the exhibit were already publicly known.

Prosecutors asked the judge to seal the exhibit, using broad arguments to reveal the identities of potential witnesses, two parcels of alleged “signal” information, and details of another investigation conducted by the FBI. He called on President Trump to reject his request to lift the law. .

Cannon ruled that the prosecution's claims were too broad and ruled that information about witnesses' personal identification and signal information should be kept confidential, but everything else could be made public.

Prosecutors told the judge they don't understand why President Trump would need to identify potential trial witnesses and federal investigators in his filing. They challenged Cannon's order and made an implicit threat to have the Eleventh Circuit strike out their case if it was denied.

Skip past newsletter promotions

The reversal on Cannon's part, which ultimately granted the motion, acknowledged the embarrassment and potential ammunition she could use to get prosecutors removed from the case if she denied the request and is overturned on appeal. It looks like a thing.

But in doing so, she scolded prosecutors in scathing terms and criticized them for putting her in such a position. “The special counsel's new allegations could and should have been raised long ago,” she wrote in a terse subhead.

Summarize this content to 100 words supervising federal judge donald trump's Lawyers for the former president were ordered to redact information about about 20 witnesses from the public version of court filings in a criminal case on charges of keeping classified documents, overturning an earlier ruling that did not allow such redactions. Overturned.The ruling requires President Trump to instead use pseudonyms (e.g., Trump Official 1 or FBI Agent 1) when referring to people close to him or investigative personnel who may be the subject of harassment threats. means that it must be used.However, although U.S. District Judge Eileen Cannon granted Special Counsel Jack Smith's main request, she used her order to reprimand prosecutors who filed motions for reconsideration, imposed new conditions, and The court ruled against the prosecution, which allowed its release.Biggest defeat for prosecutors 24 page judgment The judge's decision allowed President Trump's public filings to include witness statements that are exempt from discovery and other substantive testimony unless they identify potential witnesses.of dispute between judge and prosecutor over witnessesThe case has spilled over into other areas in recent weeks, leading prosecutors to threaten to appeal her ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, but the case is a sign that President Trump is seeking further evidence from prosecutors. It began in January after a request for disclosure documents.The motion to compel was partially redacted and filed with 70 attachments, many of which were sealed and redacted. But Trump's lawyers asked for the sealed filings to be released because many of the names in the exhibit were already publicly known.Prosecutors asked the judge to seal the exhibit, using broad arguments to reveal the identities of potential witnesses, two parcels of alleged “signal” information, and details of another investigation conducted by the FBI. He called on President Trump to reject his request to lift the law. .Cannon ruled that the prosecution's claims were too broad and ruled that information about witnesses' personal identification and signal information should be kept confidential, but everything else could be made public.Prosecutors told the judge they don't understand why President Trump would need to identify potential trial witnesses and federal investigators in his filing. They challenged Cannon's order and made an implicit threat to have the Eleventh Circuit strike out their case if it was denied.Skip past newsletter promotionssign up for President Trump on trialStay up to date on all of Donald Trump's trials. Guardian staff send out weekly updates every Thursday and bonus editions on key trial days.Privacy Notice: Newsletters may include information about charities, online advertising and content funded by external organizations. For more information, see privacy policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and Google. privacy policy and terms of service Apply.After newsletter promotionThe reversal on Cannon's part, which ultimately granted the motion, acknowledged the embarrassment and potential ammunition she could use to get prosecutors removed from the case if she denied the request and is overturned on appeal. It looks like a thing.But in doing so, she scolded prosecutors in scathing terms and criticized them for putting her in such a position. “The special counsel's new allegations could and should have been raised long ago,” she wrote in a terse subhead.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/09/trump-lawyers-redact-witness-information-classified-documents-case President Trump's lawyer orders redacting of witness information in classified documents case | Donald Trump

Back to top button