Jannah Theme License is not validated, Go to the theme options page to validate the license, You need a single license for each domain name.
USA

Read the full dissent by Sotomayor and Jackson in the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling

Washington – Supreme Court’s Landmark Judgment Rejection of affirmative action The issue in higher education provoked fierce opposition from two liberal members of the court, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson.

In this much-anticipated ruling, the court’s conservative majority ruled that the race-sensitive admissions programs at Harvard University, the nation’s oldest private school, and the University of North Carolina, the oldest public school, were unconstitutional. invalidated as

A court’s denial of affirmative action in college admissions could change the way higher education institutions across the nation consider applicants, as colleges can no longer use race as a determining factor in admissions. be.

Chief Justice John Roberts, author of the paper, said: majority opinionBut the university said it could consider students’ arguments about how race has affected their lives, such as in application essays.

supreme court split along ideological lines Although he filed lawsuits in two cases involving Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, Mr. Jackson was not involved in reviewing the disputes involving Harvard University.

Reading her opinion in court, she and Sotomayor did not criticize the decision of the Supreme Court’s six conservative majority.

“In a willingness to feed us cake, today the majority are pulling ripcords and declaring that the law allows ‘all people to be colorblind,'” Jackson wrote. “But just because race is considered irrelevant by law doesn’t mean it’s irrelevant in life.”

Sotomayor, on the other hand, argued that the majority’s “race-neutral vision will perpetuate racial segregation in higher education, because racial inequality will persist as long as it is ignored.” He warned that the decision would have “devastating consequences” for the state.

read complete opposite With comments from Sotomayor and Jackson, their dissenting opinions begin on page 70 below.

Summarize this content to 100 words

Washington – Supreme Court’s Landmark Judgment Rejection of affirmative action The issue in higher education provoked fierce opposition from two liberal members of the court, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson.In this much-anticipated ruling, the court’s conservative majority ruled that the race-sensitive admissions programs at Harvard University, the nation’s oldest private school, and the University of North Carolina, the oldest public school, were unconstitutional. invalidated as A court’s denial of affirmative action in college admissions could change the way higher education institutions across the nation consider applicants, as colleges can no longer use race as a determining factor in admissions. be.

Chief Justice John Roberts, author of the paper, said: majority opinionBut the university said it could consider students’ arguments about how race has affected their lives, such as in application essays.supreme court split along ideological lines Although he filed lawsuits in two cases involving Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, Mr. Jackson was not involved in reviewing the disputes involving Harvard University.

Reading her opinion in court, she and Sotomayor did not criticize the decision of the Supreme Court’s six conservative majority.”In a willingness to feed us cake, today the majority are pulling ripcords and declaring that the law allows ‘all people to be colorblind,'” Jackson wrote. “But just because race is considered irrelevant by law doesn’t mean it’s irrelevant in life.”Sotomayor, on the other hand, argued that the majority’s “race-neutral vision will perpetuate racial segregation in higher education, because racial inequality will persist as long as it is ignored.” He warned that the decision would have “devastating consequences” for the state.read complete opposite With comments from Sotomayor and Jackson, their dissenting opinions begin on page 70 below.

trending news

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/read-text-dissent-supreme-court-affirmative-action-ruling-opinions-justices-sotomayor-jackson/ Read the full dissent by Sotomayor and Jackson in the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling

Back to top button
situs slot https://disdukcapil.salatiga.go.id/ngacor/ slot gacor totomacau4d situs toto situs toto situs toto slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor rtp slot toto slot https://journal.dpkp.ciamiskab.go.id/ rtp slot rtp live slot gacor situs toto slot gacor situs toto situs toto togel https://faculdadediplomata.edu.br/-/ https://www.pilgrimagetour.in/-/ slot gacor situs toto slot gacor slot gacor rtp slot https://ejournal.yahukimokab.go.id/ https://mikrotik.itpln.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/ situs toto slot gacor slot gacor situs toto slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor situs toto toto slot bento4d bento4d bento4d bento4d bento4d https://smkn2depoksleman.sch.id/data/ https://www.smkn3banyumas.sch.id/-/ http://segalayangpop.id/-/ https://cpnsbatola.id/-/ https://www.urc.co.id/-/ bento4d slot777 situs togel bento4d bento4d slot777 bento4d togel online terpercaya slot gacor slot gacor