Jannah Theme License is not validated, Go to the theme options page to validate the license, You need a single license for each domain name.
USA

Sex abuse verdict outrages President Trump, but legal troubles are just beginning | Donald Trump

As a result of Donald Trump sexual assault trial It wasn’t a foregone conclusion, but his reaction when the jury found him attacking writer E. Jean Carroll was all too predictable.

The former president lashed out at judges for being biased and jurors for being “from the anti-Trump neighborhood,” or liberals. new yorkBecause they believed Carol’s account that a millionaire businessman assaulted her in the changing room of a department store in the mid-1990s. A jury ordered Carroll to pay $5 million in damages for defaming her by accusing him of “sexual abuse” and a “hoaxed fraud” for political purposes.

Trump took similar tackle Last month, he filed a lawsuit against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg after pleading not guilty to 34 criminal charges for paying hush money to porn star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 presidential election. President Trump called Bragg, who is black, an “animal” and a psychopath, and prosecutors characterized him as purely political.

All of this works well in some parts of America.

An audience of Republican voters gathered at the CNN Town Hall with Trump on Wednesday when Trump described the assault on Carroll as “playing handkerchiefs in the dressing room” and called her a “disgrace”. , evoked laughter.

But in the coming months, it will be very difficult for former, and perhaps future, American presidents to interpret their legal troubles as political persecution by Democratic elitists. The investigation against him has intensified, and more difficult legal challenges lie ahead for Trump and some of his followers.

With indictments looming in conservative Georgia, many of the key witnesses against Trump will be fellow Republicans, including Trump’s collaborators who tried to rig the 2020 election.

Similarly, the Justice Department special counsel’s investigation into President Trump’s actions leading to the Jan. 6, 2021 raid on the Capitol and the concealment of classified documents at his Florida mansion will not rely on the testimony of close aides and political figures who could serve as witnesses. is proceeding on the basis of against him

Former White House Special Counsel for Ethics and Government Reform Norman Eisen said Trump’s legal troubles were just beginning as a result.

“He’s been hit with a buzzsaw, but it’s called the rule of law. So he can rant and rant to some extent, but legal authorities can’t hold him accountable.” is where it is,” he said.

Leading the charge is an Atlanta prosecutor collecting testimony against former presidential witnesses (almost all Republicans) who tried to rig the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia. These include those who tried to help Trump steal votes but were persuaded to give evidence against Trump to save his own neck.

Fulton County District Attorney Fanny Willis has spent more than two years investigating “a multi-state coordinated plan by the Trump campaign to influence the outcome.”

Mr. Willis convened a special grand jury, held eight months of hearings before recommending charges against a dozen people, and heard evidence from 75 witnesses. Grand jury chief Emily Coase said: strongly suggested It reported to the New York Times in February that Trump was on the list.

Asked whether the jury recommended prosecuting the former president, Coes said: It’s not rocket science. ”

“It’s not going to be a big setback,” she added. “You probably have a pretty good idea of ​​what’s in there. I try very hard to convey it politely.”

Mr Willis was expected to indict Mr Trump and others this month, but the indictment will not take place until July after prosecutors negotiated immunity from the former president’s Republican co-conspirators to testify against Mr Willis and his aides. It is unlikely that it will be by mid-year. Coes said prosecutors offered immunity from prosecution for one witness in exchange for cooperating in front of a grand jury.

And some Republicans don’t need to be forced to tell the truth in court.

E Gene Carroll left court after hearing Trump was liable for $5 million in sexual abuse damages. Photo: Andrew Kelly/Reuters

The Willis investigation initially began when President Trump pressured Georgia Republican Secretary of State Brad Ravensperger to “find” about 12,000 votes to nullify Biden’s victory in Georgia at the time. The focus was on the recording tape that was playing. whole presidential election.

President Trump called the Georgia official an “enemy of the people,” saying he wouldn’t cheat the election. But jurors may think Raffensperger is more credible not only because he’s a Republican, but because he voted for Trump.

Georgia’s secretary of state spoke to the special grand jury for hours about, among other things, recording a call in early January 2021 in which President Trump pressured him to manipulate the vote. Ravensperger has not publicly commented on his own testimony, but details Trump’s threats in his book Integrity Counts.

Other witnesses are more reluctant, but may be more credible for that reason. Among them is Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, who has also come under pressure from Trump and his allies to overturn the election results. One of those who called Kemp was President Trump’s former chief of staff Mark Meadows, who was also called in to answer grand jury questions.

Mr. Willis is proof that Mr. Trump and his allies are trying to manipulate the results, including by appointing 16 fake electoral votes on behalf of the state’s legitimate electoral college members in the official business of electing the president. The investigation was expanded as more was discovered. The fake electors included Georgia Republican leader David Schaefer and a Republican member of the state legislature who has been warned of being at risk of prosecution.

Earlier this month, at least eight false electors were revealed. made a deal Mr. Schaefer is not included, but has been asked to provide evidence in return for immunity from prosecution.

Eisen said the waiver agreement was a sign that prosecution was imminent.

“We know that multiple false electors have received immunity. donald trump Because these deals are usually extended when prosecutors are preparing to file charges and believe there are lawsuits to file,” he said.

“So this is a sign of the seriousness of the prosecution. We know the conspiracy extended to the Oval Office.”

Ronald Carlson, a leading Georgia trial attorney and University of Georgia Law School professor, said prosecutors do not offer immunity lightly, and that any transaction requires that witnesses provide material testimony against Trump and his team. said to suggest.

“This is really like a straw blown by the wind. Immunity almost always comes with the requirement that the indemnified witness testify at a future criminal trial,” he said.

“I think the electors will go into great detail about how they were convened, what they did during the meeting, and how the end result — Trump’s — was certified.”

The Willis investigation also investigated a seven-hour hearing in the Georgia Senate one month after the election, orchestrated by former New York City mayor Rudolf Giuliani, Trump’s personal attorney and adviser.

Georgia public broadcast called Mr Giuliani said the state’s voting machines were rigged, thousands of ballots were illegally cast, and fake ballots were dismantled in the wake of “a series of fanciful claims and statements made by various people touted as experts”. It falsely claimed that the suitcase it came in was used to tip the nation. Counts in favor of Biden.

Giuliani also asked the Georgia legislature to create a fake electoral register to directly tie Trump to what prosecutors have envisioned as a criminal attempt to steal the election. . At the same time, Giuliani led a string of unsuccessful legal challenges to the election results in courts across the country.

Coles Said When Giuliani appeared before a grand jury, he used his attorney-client privilege to avoid answering many questions.

Another Trump attorney, John Eastman, was called to witness a plan to pressure then-Vice President Mike Pence to prevent Congress from declaring victory for Biden. The grand jury also subpoenaed Trump’s attorney and conspiracy theorist Sidney Powell. Who pushed the false claim that voting machines were rigged? for which fox news paid It will cost nearly $800 million to settle the defamation lawsuit.

Some witnesses tried to avoid testifying. Senator Lindsay Graham tried unsuccessfully to avoid appearing in court, going all the way to the United States Supreme Court. Former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, who attended a conference on invoking martial law and seizing voting machines, had to be ordered by a Florida judge to answer grand jury questions. I didn’t.

Carlson said a parade of Republican witnesses could be very damaging to President Trump, whether he wants it or not.

“If, as a prosecutor, you can call witnesses who were, so to speak, close to the royal family, it will impress the jury,” he said.

“What happens very often, especially in mob cases, is that they give immunity to one of the lower classes to testify against a big boss. He doesn’t want to, but he has immunity.” Whether they wanted to do so voluntarily or were forced to do so under immunity, Willis gathered a large number of witnesses. We are filing a lawsuit.”

Eisen said the Georgia case is likely to be stronger because it is built largely on evidence from other Republicans.

Many of the key witnesses against Trump in the Georgia case will be fellow Republicans.
Many of the key witnesses against Trump in the Georgia case will be fellow Republicans. Photo: Marco Bello/Reuters

“The fact that his offer was rejected by loyal Republican officials, including Secretary of State Brad Ravensperger and Governor Brian Kemp, makes a difference. The weight of the evidence of election interference in Georgia alone is significant. The Georgia lawsuit is a very strong lawsuit, the strongest lawsuit we’ve ever seen,” he said.

on the other hand, special adviser Jack Smith, appointed by the U.S. Department of Justice, is probing two criminal investigations involving Mr. Trump, and a Republican who may accuse the former president of his testimony has joined the investigation again.

new york times report Earlier this month, it was announced that investigators investigating the president’s mishandling of classified documents had enlisted the help of someone who worked for the president at his Mar-a-Lago mansion in Florida.

Like Willis, the Justice Department has used subpoenas to coerce witnesses to Trump’s actions to testify before grand juries, including alleging that classified documents were illegally stored in Florida. This includes whether he moved it to be known and covered up.

Again, Trump’s team dismissed the investigation as a “politically motivated witch hunt” aimed at preventing Trump from returning to the White House. But when the former president undermined his own lawyer at CNN City Hall, claiming he had “every right” to receive documents from the White House, he didn’t help himself.

“It wasn’t a secret,” he said.

So will Trump be a convicted criminal by the November 2024 presidential election?

“It’s quite possible,” Eisen said. “Court delays and appeals may mean that he will not be jailed until after the next election. It will be left to a jury.”

Summarize this content to 100 words As a result of Donald Trump sexual assault trial It wasn’t a foregone conclusion, but his reaction when the jury found him attacking writer E. Jean Carroll was all too predictable.The former president lashed out at judges for being biased and jurors for being “from the anti-Trump neighborhood,” or liberals. new yorkBecause they believed Carol’s account that a millionaire businessman assaulted her in the changing room of a department store in the mid-1990s. A jury ordered Carroll to pay $5 million in damages for defaming her by accusing him of “sexual abuse” and a “hoaxed fraud” for political purposes.Trump took similar tackle Last month, he filed a lawsuit against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg after pleading not guilty to 34 criminal charges for paying hush money to porn star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 presidential election. President Trump called Bragg, who is black, an “animal” and a psychopath, and prosecutors characterized him as purely political.All of this works well in some parts of America.An audience of Republican voters gathered at the CNN Town Hall with Trump on Wednesday when Trump described the assault on Carroll as “playing handkerchiefs in the dressing room” and called her a “disgrace”. , evoked laughter.But in the coming months, it will be very difficult for former, and perhaps future, American presidents to interpret their legal troubles as political persecution by Democratic elitists. The investigation against him has intensified, and more difficult legal challenges lie ahead for Trump and some of his followers.With indictments looming in conservative Georgia, many of the key witnesses against Trump will be fellow Republicans, including Trump’s collaborators who tried to rig the 2020 election.Similarly, the Justice Department special counsel’s investigation into President Trump’s actions leading to the Jan. 6, 2021 raid on the Capitol and the concealment of classified documents at his Florida mansion will not rely on the testimony of close aides and political figures who could serve as witnesses. is proceeding on the basis of against himFormer White House Special Counsel for Ethics and Government Reform Norman Eisen said Trump’s legal troubles were just beginning as a result.”He’s been hit with a buzzsaw, but it’s called the rule of law. So he can rant and rant to some extent, but legal authorities can’t hold him accountable.” is where it is,” he said.Leading the charge is an Atlanta prosecutor collecting testimony against former presidential witnesses (almost all Republicans) who tried to rig the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia. These include those who tried to help Trump steal votes but were persuaded to give evidence against Trump to save his own neck.He’s hitting the buzzsaw, it’s called the rule of lawNorm EisenFulton County District Attorney Fanny Willis has spent more than two years investigating “a multi-state coordinated plan by the Trump campaign to influence the outcome.”Mr. Willis convened a special grand jury, held eight months of hearings before recommending charges against a dozen people, and heard evidence from 75 witnesses. Grand jury chief Emily Coase said: strongly suggested It reported to the New York Times in February that Trump was on the list.Asked whether the jury recommended prosecuting the former president, Coes said: It’s not rocket science. ””It’s not going to be a big setback,” she added. “You probably have a pretty good idea of ​​what’s in there. I try very hard to convey it politely.”Mr Willis was expected to indict Mr Trump and others this month, but the indictment will not take place until July after prosecutors negotiated immunity from the former president’s Republican co-conspirators to testify against Mr Willis and his aides. It is unlikely that it will be by mid-year. Coes said prosecutors offered immunity from prosecution for one witness in exchange for cooperating in front of a grand jury.And some Republicans don’t need to be forced to tell the truth in court.E Gene Carroll left court after hearing Trump was liable for $5 million in sexual abuse damages. Photo: Andrew Kelly/ReutersThe Willis investigation initially began when President Trump pressured Georgia Republican Secretary of State Brad Ravensperger to “find” about 12,000 votes to nullify Biden’s victory in Georgia at the time. The focus was on the recording tape that was playing. whole presidential election.President Trump called the Georgia official an “enemy of the people,” saying he wouldn’t cheat the election. But jurors may think Raffensperger is more credible not only because he’s a Republican, but because he voted for Trump.Georgia’s secretary of state spoke to the special grand jury for hours about, among other things, recording a call in early January 2021 in which President Trump pressured him to manipulate the vote. Ravensperger has not publicly commented on his own testimony, but details Trump’s threats in his book Integrity Counts.Other witnesses are more reluctant, but may be more credible for that reason. Among them is Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, who has also come under pressure from Trump and his allies to overturn the election results. One of those who called Kemp was President Trump’s former chief of staff Mark Meadows, who was also called in to answer grand jury questions.Mr. Willis is proof that Mr. Trump and his allies are trying to manipulate the results, including by appointing 16 fake electoral votes on behalf of the state’s legitimate electoral college members in the official business of electing the president. The investigation was expanded as more was discovered. The fake electors included Georgia Republican leader David Schaefer and a Republican member of the state legislature who has been warned of being at risk of prosecution.Earlier this month, at least eight false electors were revealed. made a deal Mr. Schaefer is not included, but has been asked to provide evidence in return for immunity from prosecution.Eisen said the waiver agreement was a sign that prosecution was imminent.“We know that multiple false electors have received immunity. donald trump Because these deals are usually extended when prosecutors are preparing to file charges and believe there are lawsuits to file,” he said.“So this is a sign of the seriousness of the prosecution. We know the conspiracy extended to the Oval Office.”Ronald Carlson, a leading Georgia trial attorney and University of Georgia Law School professor, said prosecutors do not offer immunity lightly, and that any transaction requires that witnesses provide material testimony against Trump and his team. said to suggest.”This is really like a straw blown by the wind. Immunity almost always comes with the requirement that the indemnified witness testify at a future criminal trial,” he said.”I think the electors will go into great detail about how they were convened, what they did during the meeting, and how the end result — Trump’s — was certified.”The Willis investigation also investigated a seven-hour hearing in the Georgia Senate one month after the election, orchestrated by former New York City mayor Rudolf Giuliani, Trump’s personal attorney and adviser.Georgia public broadcast called Mr Giuliani said the state’s voting machines were rigged, thousands of ballots were illegally cast, and fake ballots were dismantled in the wake of “a series of fanciful claims and statements made by various people touted as experts”. It falsely claimed that the suitcase it came in was used to tip the nation. Counts in favor of Biden.Giuliani also asked the Georgia legislature to create a fake electoral register to directly tie Trump to what prosecutors have envisioned as a criminal attempt to steal the election. . At the same time, Giuliani led a string of unsuccessful legal challenges to the election results in courts across the country.Coles Said When Giuliani appeared before a grand jury, he used his attorney-client privilege to avoid answering many questions.Another Trump attorney, John Eastman, was called to witness a plan to pressure then-Vice President Mike Pence to prevent Congress from declaring victory for Biden. The grand jury also subpoenaed Trump’s attorney and conspiracy theorist Sidney Powell. Who pushed the false claim that voting machines were rigged? for which fox news paid It will cost nearly $800 million to settle the defamation lawsuit.Some witnesses tried to avoid testifying. Senator Lindsay Graham tried unsuccessfully to avoid appearing in court, going all the way to the United States Supreme Court. Former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, who attended a conference on invoking martial law and seizing voting machines, had to be ordered by a Florida judge to answer grand jury questions. I didn’t.Carlson said a parade of Republican witnesses could be very damaging…
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/14/trump-sexual-abuse-verdict-e-jean-carroll-legal-troubles Sex abuse verdict outrages President Trump, but legal troubles are just beginning | Donald Trump

Back to top button