Why Dominion Won $1.6 Billion Lawsuit Against Fox News | Fox News
As fox news Continuing to air lies about the Dominion voting system and the 2020 election, one of its star hosts, Tucker Carlson, repeatedly used the word “reckless” to describe what the network was doing.
Those messages were the first pieces of evidence presented Tuesday by Justin Nelson, the attorney representing Dominion, and began a debate about why the judge ruled the network to defame its clients. It was a word” – Nelson will have to prove that Fox acted with “actual malice”.
“Unlike all other defamation cases, we have in their own words the fact that they knew it was false,” Nelson said.
It was an example of how the core of Dominion’s $1.6 billion lawsuit against Fox was the words out of the mouth of a Fox employee. Whatever the future case may be, the Dominion may already have won. The message tells how a senior official in one of America’s most powerful media organizations released information he knew to be false at a time when American democracy was under attack. It provides important historical records.
The case has drawn so much public attention that it has held political parties accountable for efforts to overturn the 2020 election, which culminated in a violent uprising at the U.S. Capitol on January 6. represents one of the most aggressive efforts to inflict.
There was a Fox employee who reviewed the script for Jeanine Pirro’s show and wrote that it was “riddled with conspiracies”. There was a brain room that was. Another Fox employee joked that he got a “tattoo” on his body because he was familiar with a fact-checked email he received from Dominion.There was always a Fox employee who pointed out Rudy Giuliani And when Sydney Powell appeared on the network, it was “guaranteed gold,” even though the network knew the claims they were making were false.
Fox’s defamation defense, while potentially legally valid, doesn’t wipe out what’s already been revealed.Attorney representing the network, Erin Murphy, said in court this week that Fox was incumbent. She said she could not be held accountable because she only broadcast claims from representatives of the President of the United States. Murphy argued that even if Fox executives were generally aware of what was being broadcast and didn’t believe it, it wasn’t enough to hold them accountable. One Eric Davis seemed skeptical of some of these arguments.
Tucker Carlson’s message has little to do with whether other Fox officials deliberately broadcast false information, as Murphy emphasized.
A jury will ultimately decide on the liability issue, but seeing one of the network’s most visible stars vehemently disagree with what was happening on air has the potential to stick in the minds of the American public. there is.
Underpinning the lawsuit is also a dueling vision of Fox’s power and the role it plays in America’s media. Just one of the news networks. Its decision to air the allegations about Dominion was just an attempt to make it understandable to viewers, she said, calling their work a C-span that airs strictly political proceedings without comment or narrative. compared with
However, Dominion’s lawyers have painted a more realistic picture of Fox, emphasizing the immense influence Fox has among conservatives. Fox didn’t just give airtime to Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani, the network made them household names. I made it
“There was a prudent decision to release the Kraken,” Rodney Smora, another Dominion attorney, said Tuesday, referring to Powell.
Another Dominion attorney, Stephen Shackleford, made a similar point in his argument on Wednesday. Fox said she had been barred from meetings at the White House, but still chose to give her the platform.
Another lawyer representing Dominion, Stephen Shackleford, said: “Sydney was looking for someone related to her and Fox made her related.” No, but the historical record needs to be clear.”
A full trial in the case is scheduled to begin on April 17.
Summarize this content to 100 words As fox news Continuing to air lies about the Dominion voting system and the 2020 election, one of its star hosts, Tucker Carlson, repeatedly used the word “reckless” to describe what the network was doing.Those messages were the first pieces of evidence presented Tuesday by Justin Nelson, the attorney representing Dominion, and began a debate about why the judge ruled the network to defame its clients. It was a word” – Nelson will have to prove that Fox acted with “actual malice”.”Unlike all other defamation cases, we have in their own words the fact that they knew it was false,” Nelson said.It was an example of how the core of Dominion’s $1.6 billion lawsuit against Fox was the words out of the mouth of a Fox employee. Whatever the future case may be, the Dominion may already have won. The message tells how a senior official in one of America’s most powerful media organizations released information he knew to be false at a time when American democracy was under attack. It provides important historical records.The case has drawn so much public attention that it has held political parties accountable for efforts to overturn the 2020 election, which culminated in a violent uprising at the U.S. Capitol on January 6. represents one of the most aggressive efforts to inflict.There was a Fox employee who reviewed the script for Jeanine Pirro’s show and wrote that it was “riddled with conspiracies”. There was a brain room that was. Another Fox employee joked that he got a “tattoo” on his body because he was familiar with a fact-checked email he received from Dominion.There was always a Fox employee who pointed out Rudy Giuliani And when Sydney Powell appeared on the network, it was “guaranteed gold,” even though the network knew the claims they were making were false.Fox’s defamation defense, while potentially legally valid, doesn’t wipe out what’s already been revealed.Attorney representing the network, Erin Murphy, said in court this week that Fox was incumbent. She said she could not be held accountable because she only broadcast claims from representatives of the President of the United States. Murphy argued that even if Fox executives were generally aware of what was being broadcast and didn’t believe it, it wasn’t enough to hold them accountable. One Eric Davis seemed skeptical of some of these arguments.Tucker Carlson’s message has little to do with whether other Fox officials deliberately broadcast false information, as Murphy emphasized.A jury will ultimately decide on the liability issue, but seeing one of the network’s most visible stars vehemently disagree with what was happening on air has the potential to stick in the minds of the American public. there is.Underpinning the lawsuit is also a dueling vision of Fox’s power and the role it plays in America’s media. Just one of the news networks. Its decision to air the allegations about Dominion was just an attempt to make it understandable to viewers, she said, calling their work a C-span that airs strictly political proceedings without comment or narrative. compared withHowever, Dominion’s lawyers have painted a more realistic picture of Fox, emphasizing the immense influence Fox has among conservatives. Fox didn’t just give airtime to Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani, the network made them household names. I made it”There was a prudent decision to release the Kraken,” Rodney Smora, another Dominion attorney, said Tuesday, referring to Powell.Another Dominion attorney, Stephen Shackleford, made a similar point in his argument on Wednesday. Fox said she had been barred from meetings at the White House, but still chose to give her the platform.Another lawyer representing Dominion, Stephen Shackleford, said: “Sydney was looking for someone related to her and Fox made her related.” No, but the historical record needs to be clear.”A full trial in the case is scheduled to begin on April 17.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/mar/23/dominion-fox-news-defamation-lawsuit-winner Why Dominion Won $1.6 Billion Lawsuit Against Fox News | Fox News